177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18076351)
21. Point-of-Care Versus Central Laboratory Measurements of Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Glucose, Bicarbonate and Electrolytes: A Prospective Observational Study in Critically Ill Patients.
Allardet-Servent J; Lebsir M; Dubroca C; Fabrigoule M; Jordana S; Signouret T; Castanier M; Thomas G; Soundaravelou R; Lepidi A; Delapierre L; Penaranda G; Halfon P; Seghboyan JM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169593. PubMed ID: 28072822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer.
Uyanik M; Sertoglu E; Kayadibi H; Tapan S; Serdar MA; Bilgi C; Kurt I
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2015 Apr; 75(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 25431133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the i-STAT portable clinical analyzer in chickens (Gallus gallus).
Steinmetz HW; Vogt R; Kästner S; Riond B; Hatt JM
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2007 Jul; 19(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 17609347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of cassette-based blood gas analyzers to monitor blood glucose and lactate levels in a surgical intensive care setting.
Poesen K; De Prins M; Van den Berghe G; Van Eldere J; Vanstapel F
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 51(7):1417-27. PubMed ID: 23492571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hydroxocobalamin and cyanocobalamin interference on co-oximetry based hemoglobin measurements.
Pamidi PV; DeAbreu M; Kim D; Mansouri S
Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Mar; 401(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 19041637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Maltose interference-free test strips for blood glucose testing at point-of-care: a laboratory performance evaluation.
Ng WY; Tiong CC; Jacob E
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Nov; 12(11):889-93. PubMed ID: 20879959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of i-STAT portable clinical analyzer in a neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit.
Murthy JN; Hicks JM; Soldin SJ
Clin Biochem; 1997 Jul; 30(5):385-9. PubMed ID: 9253514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Near-patient blood gas and electrolyte analyses are accurate when performed by non-laboratory-trained individuals.
Zaloga GP; Dudas L; Roberts P; Bortenschlager L; Black K; Prielipp R
J Clin Monit; 1993 Nov; 9(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 8106888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Neonatal hemoglobin affects the accuracy of whole blood bilirubin measurement on GEM Premier 4000 blood gas analyzers.
Huang Y; Dean R; Dubbelman Y; Vincent A; Khurshid F
Pract Lab Med; 2021 May; 25():e00231. PubMed ID: 34095416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A two-center evaluation of the blood gas immediate response mobile analyzer (IRMA).
Ceriotti F; Del BL; Bonini P; Germagnoli L; Ferrero CA; Pezzo M; Marocchi A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Feb; 40(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 11939493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How reliable are electrolyte and metabolite results measured by a blood gas analyzer in the ED?
Uysal E; Acar YA; Kutur A; Cevik E; Salman N; Tezel O
Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 34(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 26658635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of a continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in intensive care unit patients.
Frasca D; Dahyot-Fizelier C; Catherine K; Levrat Q; Debaene B; Mimoz O
Crit Care Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2277-82. PubMed ID: 21666449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Five-Year Two-Center Retrospective Comparison of Central Laboratory Glucose to GEM 4000 and ABL 800 Blood Glucose: Demonstrating the (In)adequacy of Blood Gas Glucose.
Cembrowski G; Jung J; Mei J; Xu E; Curic T; Gibney RN; Jacka M; Sadrzadeh H
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):535-545. PubMed ID: 31686527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of two analyzers to determine selected venous blood analytes of Quaker parrots (Myiopsitta monachus).
Rettenmund CL; Heatley JJ; Russell KE
J Zoo Wildl Med; 2014 Jun; 45(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 25000685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Suitability of POC lactate methods for fetal and perinatal lactate testing: considerations for accuracy, specificity and decision making criteria.
Orsonneau JL; Fraissinet F; Sébille-Rivain V; Dudouet D; Bigot-Corbel E
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 51(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 23096019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analytical performance of a portable critical care blood gas analyzer.
Schlebusch H; Paffenholz I; Zerback R; Leinberger R
Clin Chim Acta; 2001 May; 307(1-2):107-12. PubMed ID: 11369344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Stat and CDI-300 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer.
Walton HG; Duvall TB; Van den Hout J; Boucher DM
J Extra Corpor Technol; 1993; 25(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 10171685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the Konelab 20XT clinical chemistry analyzer.
Stojanović N; Rogić D; Stavljenić-Rukavina A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(6):646-53. PubMed ID: 16006262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multicentre evaluation of the Bayer DAX system.
Morosini L; Rossetti M; Berti P; Pallotti G; Fabbri V; Mambelli MC; Franceschin A; Dell'Anna L; Cappelletti P; Brocco G
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Dec; 31(12):875-96. PubMed ID: 8136420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Airborne and rescue point-of-care testing.
Herr DM; Newton NC; Santrach PJ; Hankins DG; Burritt MF
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Oct; 104(4 Suppl 1):S54-8. PubMed ID: 7484950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
