These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18076354)

  • 21. Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.
    Paulo S; Mendes S; Vizinho R; Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1187-98. PubMed ID: 15587576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Practical exercises on diagnostic test interpretation].
    Perez Sempere A; Diaz Guzman J
    Neurologia; 2003 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():46-52. PubMed ID: 14669107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Drop the Likelihood Ratio. A Novel Non-electronic Tool for Interpreting Diagnostic Test Results.
    Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hellmich M
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 25609360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Making the most of a patient's laboratory data: optimisation of signal-to-noise ratio.
    Petersen PH
    Clin Biochem Rev; 2005 Nov; 26(4):91-6. PubMed ID: 16648881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests.
    Knottnerus JA; Leffers P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1992 Oct; 45(10):1143-54. PubMed ID: 1474411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity values can be back-calculated when the odds ratios are known.
    Simel DL; Easter J; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 23021858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of peak flow variability and methacholine responsiveness in predicting changes from pre-test diagnosis of asthma.
    Parameswaran K; Belda J; Sears MR
    Eur Respir J; 1999 Dec; 14(6):1358-62. PubMed ID: 10624767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bivariate categorical data analysis using normal linear conditional multinomial probability model.
    Sun B; Sutradhar B
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):469-86. PubMed ID: 25320019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The interpretation of test results.
    Binder M; Dreiseitl S
    J Cutan Med Surg; 2000 Jan; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10689223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule].
    Vermeulen M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2421-4. PubMed ID: 11776667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The concept of reference change values (RCV). Will it supersede reference intervals?].
    Walz B; Fierz W
    Ther Umsch; 2015 Feb; 72(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 25630296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reference change values.
    Fraser CG
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Sep; 50(5):807-12. PubMed ID: 21958344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biological variation and reference change values of CA 19-9, CEA, AFP in serum of healthy individuals.
    Erden G; Barazi AO; Tezcan G; Yildirimkaya MM
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2008; 68(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 17926198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bayesian clinical reasoning: does intuitive estimation of likelihood ratios on an ordinal scale outperform estimation of sensitivities and specificities?
    Moreira J; Bisoffi Z; Narváez A; Van den Ende J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 19018928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios.
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Mar; 31(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9506499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of reference change values in clinical laboratories.
    Bugdayci G; Oguzman H; Arattan HY; Sasmaz G
    Clin Lab; 2015; 61(3-4):251-7. PubMed ID: 25974990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurement of expired carbon dioxide, oxygen and volume in conjunction with pretest probability estimation as a method to diagnose and exclude pulmonary venous thromboembolism.
    Kline JA; Hogg M
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2006 Jul; 26(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 16836693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Likelihood ratios: a real improvement for clinical decision making?
    Dujardin B; Van den Ende J; Van Gompel A; Unger JP; Van der Stuyft P
    Eur J Epidemiol; 1994 Feb; 10(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7957786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.