210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18076473)
1. Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM.
Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 18076473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
Muir WM
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of genome-wide haplotype effects in half-sib designs.
Kolbehdari D; Schaeffer LR; Robinson JA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 18076472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting energy balance for dairy cows using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism information.
Verbyla KL; Calus MP; Mulder HA; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2757-64. PubMed ID: 20494185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables.
Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of heritability estimates on high-density single nucleotide polymorphism analyses with related animals.
Hassen A; Avendano S; Hill WG; Fernando RL; Lamont SJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):868-75. PubMed ID: 19028848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using eigenvalues as variance priors in the prediction of genomic breeding values by principal component analysis.
Macciotta NP; Gaspa G; Steri R; Nicolazzi EL; Dimauro C; Pieramati C; Cappio-Borlino A
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2765-74. PubMed ID: 20494186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic selection.
Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 18076469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of missing marker genotypes on the accuracy of gene-assisted breeding value estimation: a comparison of methods.
Mulder HA; Meuwissen TH; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
Animal; 2010 Jan; 4(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 22443613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term selection strategies for complex traits using high-density genetic markers.
Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4646-56. PubMed ID: 22818479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
