669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18076872)
1. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
Welsh TN
Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism.
Buetti S; Kerzel D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction between space and number representations during motor preparation in manual aiming.
Ishihara M; Jacquin-Courtois S; Flory V; Salemme R; Imanaka K; Rossetti Y
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1009-16. PubMed ID: 16406028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How time modulates spatial responses.
Vallesi A; McIntosh AR; Stuss DT
Cortex; 2011 Feb; 47(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 19818438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
Gevers W; Lammertyn J; Notebaert W; Verguts T; Fias W
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 16423320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
Druey MD; Hübner R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing.
Peyrin C; Mermillod M; Chokron S; Marendaz C
Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16837115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task].
Ferrier L; Staudt A; Reilhac G; Jiménez M; Brouillet D
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 18266507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
Buetti S; Kerzel D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect.
Ishihara M; Keller PE; Rossetti Y; Prinz W
Cortex; 2008 Apr; 44(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 18387578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linguistic and spatial information for action.
Bartolo A; Weisbecker A; Coello Y
Behav Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 184(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 17681618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
Wühr P; Kunde W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses.
Huestegge L; Koch I
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects.
Wühr P; Biebl R; Ansorge U
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 18444754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
