158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18076916)
1. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size.
Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Myschetzky PS; Suburu RE; Kelly BS; Wilson ML; Chen SC; Lee F
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1991; 137():107-11. PubMed ID: 1947827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of transition zone volume by transrectal ultrasound in patients with clinically benign prostatic hyperplasia: agreement with enucleated prostate adenoma weight.
Baltaci S; Yagci C; Aksoy H; Elan AH; Gögüs O
J Urol; 2000 Jul; 164(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 10841600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate?
Nathan MS; Seenivasagam K; Mei Q; Wickham JE; Miller RA
Br J Urol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8814846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Wolff JM; Boeckmann W; Mattelaer P; Handt S; Adam G; Jakse G
Eur Urol; 1995; 28(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8521887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A reliability analysis of transrectal echographic estimation of prostatic volume].
Llanes González L; Luján Galán M; Páez Borda A; Ruíz Rubio JL; Fernández González I; Berenguer Sánchez A
Actas Urol Esp; 1999 Jan; 23(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10089627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate volume determination: differential volume measurements comparing CT and TRUS.
Kälkner KM; Kubicek G; Nilsson J; Lundell M; Levitt S; Nilsson S
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Nov; 81(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 17069912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound.
Terris MK; Stamey TA
J Urol; 1991 May; 145(5):984-7. PubMed ID: 2016815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography.
Rahmouni A; Yang A; Tempany CM; Frenkel T; Epstein J; Walsh P; Leichner PK; Ricci C; Zerhouni E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 1385499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging and sonography of early prostatic cancer: pathologic and imaging features that influence identification and diagnosis.
Ellis JH; Tempany C; Sarin MS; Gatsonis C; Rifkin MD; McNeil BJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):865-72. PubMed ID: 8141009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonographic estimation of prostatic size in canine cadavers.
Atalan G; Holt PE; Barr FJ; Brown PJ
Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 10425234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Volume determinations of the whole prostate and of the adenoma by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with surgical specimen].
Cabello Benavente R; Jara Rascón J; Monzó JI; López Díez I; Subirá Ríos D; Lledó García E; Herranz Amo F; Hernández Fernández C
Actas Urol Esp; 2006 Feb; 30(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 16700208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations.
Matthews GJ; Motta J; Fracehia JA
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(9):501-5. PubMed ID: 8906481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of prostate weight estimation by digital rectal examination versus transrectal ultrasonography.
Loeb S; Han M; Roehl KA; Antenor JA; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 15592029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and repeatability of prostate volume measurements by transrectal ultrasound.
Eri LM; Thomassen H; Brennhovd B; Håheim LL
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 12627211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal and abdominal echography and its implication for the measurement of the PSA density for the diagnosis of prostate cancer].
Rodríguez-Patrón Rodríguez R; Mayayo Dehesa T; Lennie Zucharino A; González Galán A
Arch Esp Urol; 2002 Sep; 55(7):797-806. PubMed ID: 12380308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies.
Kassouf W; Nakanishi H; Ochiai A; Babaian KN; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 17499289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies.
Borboroglu PG; Comer SW; Riffenburgh RH; Amling CL
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 10604336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
