These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18077055)

  • 1. On the resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; LeBas NR; Puurtinen M; Tomkins JL
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18077055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits and the maintenance of genetic diversity in song sparrows.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 19032502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; Simmons LW; Tomkins JL
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):684-6. PubMed ID: 11287953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genic capture and the genetic basis of sexually selected traits in the zebra finch.
    Birkhead TR; Pellatt EJ; Matthews IM; Roddis NJ; Hunter FM; McPhie F; Castillo-Juarez H
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2389-98. PubMed ID: 17236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17619173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
    Miller CW; Moore AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.
    Bussière LF; Hunt J; Stölting KN; Jennions MD; Brooks R
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17987390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): toward a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Zhou Y; Kuster HK; Pettis JS; Danka RG; Gleason JM; Greenfield MD
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1317-34. PubMed ID: 18346222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Male sex drive and the maintenance of sex: evidence from Drosophila.
    Singh RS; Artieri CG
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S100-6. PubMed ID: 20212005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual selection: does condition dependence fail to resolve the 'lek paradox'?
    Cotton S; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2007 May; 17(9):R335-7. PubMed ID: 17470350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).
    Agbali M; Reichard M; Bryjová A; Bryja J; Smith C
    Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1683-96. PubMed ID: 20148959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice.
    Puurtinen M; Ketola T; Kotiaho JS
    Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 19772439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song.
    Brandt LS; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):821-8. PubMed ID: 15271081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lekking without a paradox in the buff-breasted sandpiper.
    Lanctot RB; Scribner KT; Lanctot RB; Weatherhead PJ; Kempenaers B
    Am Nat; 1997 Jun; 149(6):1051-70. PubMed ID: 18811263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.