These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18078222)

  • 1. Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: evidence from the Stroop task.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1305-14. PubMed ID: 18078222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To group or not to group: an ecological consideration of the stroop effect.
    Reynolds M; Kwan D; Smilek D
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):275-91. PubMed ID: 20371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.
    Fuentes LJ; Ortells JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Dec; 84(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 8128904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks.
    Shao Z; Roelofs A; Martin RC; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1806-1820. PubMed ID: 26030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.
    Starreveld PA; La Heij W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):721-733. PubMed ID: 27714665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: the role of selection for action.
    Brown TL
    Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 8644887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active inhibition of a distractor word: the distractor precue benefit in the Stroop color-naming task.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):799-812. PubMed ID: 21480743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An optimal viewing position effect in the Stroop task when only one letter is the color carrier.
    Parris BA; Sharma D; Weekes B
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 17953147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grouping does not require attention.
    Lamy D; Segal H; Ruderman L
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Jan; 68(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 16617826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tracking eye movements to localize Stroop interference in naming: word planning versus articulatory buffering.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1332-47. PubMed ID: 24749961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The stress of Stroop performance: physiological and emotional responses to color-word interference, task pacing, and pacing speed.
    Renaud P; Blondin JP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1997 Sep; 27(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 9342640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies.
    Taylor SF; Kornblum S; Lauber EJ; Minoshima S; Koeppe RA
    Neuroimage; 1997 Aug; 6(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 9299382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention, exposure duration, and gaze shifting in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):860-73. PubMed ID: 21480746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To what extent do Gestalt grouping principles influence tactile perception?
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):538-61. PubMed ID: 21574680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A confound in the standard control condition of the Stroop experiment.
    Zajano MJ; Hoyceantyls EM; Ouellette JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Dec; 53(3):835-41. PubMed ID: 7322781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.