146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18078884)
1. Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Yau WP; Leung A; Liu KG; Yan CH; Wong LL; Chiu KY
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1150-61. PubMed ID: 18078884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraobserver errors in obtaining visually selected anatomic landmarks during registration process in nonimage-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric experiment.
Yau WP; Leung A; Chiu KY; Tang WM; Ng TP
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Aug; 20(5):591-601. PubMed ID: 16309994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The landmarks of centers of the distal femur and the proximal tibia in sagittal plane for application in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Hangsaphuk N; Tanavalee A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S69-74. PubMed ID: 20128072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of the transepicondylar axis as an anatomical landmark in total knee arthroplasty.
Stoeckl B; Nogler M; Krismer M; Beimel C; de la Barrera JL; Kessler O
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 16950043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement.
Jenny JY; Boeri C
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Feb; 75(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15022812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining the errors in the registration process during imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
Davis ET; Pagkalos J; Gallie PA; Macgroarty K; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):698-701. PubMed ID: 23972297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of intra-operative measurement of the mechanical axes of the lower limb during total knee replacement with a non-image-based navigation system.
Jenny JY; Boeri C; Picard F; Leitner F
Comput Aided Surg; 2004; 9(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 16192056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precise landmarking in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty is critical to final alignment.
Brin YS; Livshetz I; Antoniou J; Greenberg-Dotan S; Zukor DJ
J Orthop Res; 2010 Oct; 28(10):1355-9. PubMed ID: 20309860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alignment of resection planes in total knee replacement obtained with the conventional technique, as assessed by a modern computer-based navigation system.
Belvedere C; Ensini A; Leardini A; Bianchi L; Catani F; Giannini S
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Jun; 3(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 17619241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of the landmark registration safe zones during total knee arthroplasty using an imageless navigation system.
Amanatullah DF; Di Cesare PE; Meere PA; Pereira GC
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):938-42. PubMed ID: 23566700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the optical system and anatomic points on computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Schlatterer B; Linares JM; Chabrand P; Sprauel JM; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Jun; 100(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 24835533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BoneMorphing versus freehand localization of anatomical landmarks: consequences for the reproducibility of implant positioning in total knee arthroplasty.
Perrin N; Stindel E; Roux C
Comput Aided Surg; 2005; 10(5-6):301-9. PubMed ID: 16410232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty].
Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
Bové JC
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement. Preliminary results: report of 60 cases].
El Masri F; Rammal H; Ghanem I; El Hage S; El Abiad R; Kharrat K; Dagher F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18456061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of navigated lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomies.
Goleski P; Warkentine B; Lo D; Gyuricza C; Kendoff D; Pearle AD
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2179-86. PubMed ID: 18593844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia.
Klein GR; Austin MS; Smith EB; Hozack WJ
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Feb; 21(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 16520220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis of intra-operative variation in femorotibial alignment in the coronal plane during computer navigated total knee replacement.
Mohanlal P; Jain S
Acta Orthop Belg; 2010 Apr; 76(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 20503950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?
Victor J; Van Doninck D; Labey L; Innocenti B; Parizel PM; Bellemans J
Knee; 2009 Oct; 16(5):358-65. PubMed ID: 19195896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
