These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1807996)

  • 1. Image quality comparisons of X-Omat RP, L and B films.
    Van Dis ML; Beck FM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):132-4. PubMed ID: 1807996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information yield: a comparison of Kodak T-Mat G, Ortho L and RP X-Omat films.
    Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Peterson MG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2599233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions.
    Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitometric and image analysis of T-grain film.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Aug; 62(2):218-20. PubMed ID: 3462620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative Polaroid roentgenograms.
    Smith MJ
    Urology; 1987 Nov; 30(5):509-12. PubMed ID: 3672692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M; Shearer DR
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of automated nonroller processing on the sensitometric characteristics of 3 intraoral film types.
    Geist JR; Brand JW; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jul; 96(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 12847452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films using manual and automatic processing solutions.
    Fletcher JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 3468472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on sensitometric properties of ULTRA-SPEED and EKTASPEED films.
    Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jan; 71(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 1994314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [New film for intraoral radiography].
    Verdonschot EH; Duijsings JH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Apr; 108(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 11383356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.