BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1808000)

  • 1. Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 1808000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8508938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs.
    Hellén-Halme K; Lith A; Shi XQ
    Oral Radiol; 2020 Apr; 36(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 31004276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
    Akesson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients.
    Kullman L; Al-Asfour A; Zetterqvist L; Andersson L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 17340902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.
    Pham D; Jonasson G; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20085501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level.
    Akesson L; Håkansson J; Rohlin M
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 May; 19(5):326-32. PubMed ID: 1517478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of alveolar bone levels from bitewing, periapical and panoramic radiographs in periodontitis patients.
    Gedik R; Marakoglu I; Demirer S
    West Indian Med J; 2008 Sep; 57(4):410-3. PubMed ID: 19566026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between panoramic and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of periodontal bone loss.
    Rohlin M; Akesson L; Hakansson J; Hakansson H; Nasstrom K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 May; 18(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 2635121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of alveolar bone loss and angular bony defects on panoramic radiographs.
    Kasaj A; Vasiliu Ch; Willershausen B
    Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jan; 13(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 18226994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study to determine the added value of 740 screening panoramic radiographs compared to intraoral radiography in the management of adult (>18 years) dentate patients in a primary care setting.
    Rushton MN; Rushton VE
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):661-9. PubMed ID: 22542499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Panoramic and restrictive intraoral radiography in comprehensive oral radiographic diagnosis.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1995 Aug; 103(4):191-8. PubMed ID: 7552948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative diagnostic assessment of anterior tooth and bone status using panoramic and periapical radiography.
    Le T; Nassery K; Kahlert B; Heithersay G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 22372273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs for the assessment of alveolar bone levels in a periodontal maintenance population.
    Persson RE; Tzannetou S; Feloutzis AG; Brägger U; Persson GR; Lang NP
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 30(9):833-9. PubMed ID: 12956660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and panoramic assessment of marginal bone loss. A cadaver study.
    Soikkonen K; Wolf J; Tenkanen M
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1990; 86(3-4):137-41. PubMed ID: 2094846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone changes from color-coded with subtraction radiographs.
    Shi XQ; Eklund I; Tronje G; Welander U; Stamatakis HC; Engström PE; Engström GN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10202476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observer agreement in the assessment of mandibular trabecular bone pattern from panoramic radiographs.
    Taguchi A; Tanimoto K; Suei Y; Otani K; Wadamoto M; Akagawa Y; Wada T; Rohlin M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Mar; 26(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 9442623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.