112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1808001)
21. Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: the Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit.
Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC; Schneeberger P; Buser D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 11402291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Brasil DM; Vasconcelos KF; Haiter Neto F; Boscolo FN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk assessment from bitewing radiography.
Velders XL; van Aken J; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Nov; 20(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 1808009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiation absorbed doses in cephalography.
Eliasson S; Julin P; Richter S; Stenström B
Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 6585997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation during lateral cephalometric radiography].
Patsakas AJ; Donta CN; Tsiklakis KD
Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Jun; 4(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2640655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reducing transmitted radiation in dental radiography.
Bourgeois M; Wood RE; Pharoah MJ
Health Phys; 1992 Jun; 62(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 1628986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Absorbed dose reduced by sliced exposure using sector selector system with rotational panoramic radiography.
Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8620590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Organ absorbed doses in intraoral dental radiography.
Lecomber AR; Faulkner K
Br J Radiol; 1993 Nov; 66(791):1035-41. PubMed ID: 8281379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Absorbed doses from temporomandibular joint radiography.
Brooks SL; Lanzetta ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jun; 59(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 3859827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The use of a thyroid collar for intraoral radiography].
Schmidt K; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Jun; 105(6):209-12. PubMed ID: 11928141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Absorbed radiation dose during lateral cephalometric radiography: comparison of screen-film systems and field-size combinations.
Tsiklakis K; Donta-Bakoyanni C; Tassopoulou M; Kamenopoulou V
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 11314319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Absorbed doses and energy imparted from radiographic examination of velopharyngeal function during speech.
Isberg A; Julin P; Kraepelien T; Henrikson CO
Cleft Palate J; 1989 Apr; 26(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 2706778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography.
Visser H; Rödig T; Hermann KP
Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11407766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effectiveness of the thyroid shield in dental radiology.
Sikorski PA; Taylor KW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Aug; 58(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 6592516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children.
Bankvall G; Håkansson HA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 6954429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
