These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1808071)

  • 1. A study of Baroda Development Screening Test for infants.
    Phatak P; Dhapre M; Pandit AN; Kulkarni S
    Indian Pediatr; 1991 Aug; 28(8):843-9. PubMed ID: 1808071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baroda development screening test for infants.
    Phatak AT; Khurana B
    Indian Pediatr; 1991 Jan; 28(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 1711514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trivandrum Developmental Screening Chart.
    Nair MK; George B; Philip E; Lekshmi MA; Haran JC; Sathy N
    Indian Pediatr; 1991 Aug; 28(8):869-72. PubMed ID: 1725519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of a new Lucknow Development Screen for Indian children aged 6 months to 2 years.
    Bhave A; Bhargava R; Kumar R
    J Child Neurol; 2010 Jan; 25(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 19448137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayley Scales of Infant Development Screening Test-Gross Motor Subtest: efficacy in determining need for services.
    Jackson BJ; Needelman H; Roberts H; Willet S; McMorris C
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2012; 24(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 22207470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test.
    Harris SR; Daniels LE
    J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 11487752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age at diagnosis of deaf babies: a retrospective analysis highlighting the advantage of newborn hearing screening.
    Canale A; Favero E; Lacilla M; Recchia E; Schindler A; Roggero N; Albera R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1283-9. PubMed ID: 16488484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 393, December 2007. Newborn screening.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1497-500. PubMed ID: 18055755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome in high risk infants.
    Godbole K; Barve S; Chaudhari S
    Indian Pediatr; 1997 Jun; 34(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 9357204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development of a screening tool to evaluate gross motor function in HIV-infected infants.
    Hilburn N; Potterton J; Stewart A; Becker P
    AIDS Care; 2011 Dec; 23(12):1619-25. PubMed ID: 21732898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-tiered immunoreactive trypsinogen-based newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Colorado: screening efficacy and diagnostic outcomes.
    Sontag MK; Hammond KB; Zielenski J; Wagener JS; Accurso FJ
    J Pediatr; 2005 Sep; 147(3 Suppl):S83-8. PubMed ID: 16202790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Follow-up default in a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening programme in a low-income country.
    Olusanya BO
    Child Care Health Dev; 2009 Mar; 35(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 19228154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the Test of Infant Motor Performance.
    Kolobe TH; Bulanda M; Susman L
    Phys Ther; 2004 Dec; 84(12):1144-56. PubMed ID: 15563255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cluster-randomised trial of screening for language disorders in toddlers.
    de Koning HJ; de Ridder-Sluiter JG; van Agt HM; Reep-van den Bergh CM; van der Stege HA; Korfage IJ; Polder JJ; van der Maas PJ
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 15333268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newborn screening--is it really that simple?
    Wiley V; Carpenter K; Bayliss U; Wilcken B
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():107-10. PubMed ID: 15906711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening of newborns and high-risk group of children for inborn metabolic disorders using tandem mass spectrometry in South Korea: a three-year report.
    Yoon HR; Lee KR; Kang S; Lee DH; Yoo HW; Min WK; Cho DH; Shin SM; Kim J; Song J; Yoon HJ; Seo S; Hahn SH
    Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Apr; 354(1-2):167-80. PubMed ID: 15748614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.
    Kirkim G; Serbetcioglu B; Erdag TK; Ceryan K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. State newborn screening in the tandem mass spectrometry era: more tests, more false-positive results.
    Tarini BA; Christakis DA; Welch HG
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):448-56. PubMed ID: 16882794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age.
    Hack M; Taylor HG; Drotar D; Schluchter M; Cartar L; Wilson-Costello D; Klein N; Friedman H; Mercuri-Minich N; Morrow M
    Pediatrics; 2005 Aug; 116(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 16061586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.