These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Risk of thrombosis during coronary angioplasty with low osmolality contrast media. Esplugas E; Cequier A; Jara F; Mauri J; Soler T; Sala J; Sabate X Am J Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 68(10):1020-4. PubMed ID: 1927914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparative study of iohexol and iopamidol as cardioangiographic contrast media]. Esplugas E; Jara F; Sala J; Cequier A Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 2326538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of high- and low-osmolar contrast media on renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate in euvolaemic and dehydrated rats. A comparison between ioxithalamate, iopamidol, iohexol and ioxaglate. Nygren A; Ulfendahl HR Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 2775601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Thrombogenicity of hydrophilically coated guide wires and catheters. Leach KR; Kurisu Y; Carlson JE; Repa I; Epstein DH; Urness M; Sahatjian R; Hunter DW; Casteneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):675-7. PubMed ID: 2343111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Aspirin and fraxiparine in the prevention of laser induced thrombosis in the presence of iodinated contrast media. Aguejouf O; Belougne Malfatti E; Doutremepuich F; Doutremepuich C Thromb Res; 1998 Nov; 92(3):105-13. PubMed ID: 9806362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of iodinated contrast media on blood clotting. Corot C; Perrin JM; Belleville J; Amiel M; Eloy R Invest Radiol; 1989 May; 24(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 2745021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy. Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pain in peripheral arteriography: an assessment of conventional versus ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast agents. Murphy G; Campbell DR; Fraser DB Can Assoc Radiol J; 1988 Jun; 39(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 2967829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of re-use on the physical characteristics of angiographic catheters. Bentolila P; Jacob R; Roberge F J Med Eng Technol; 1990; 14(6):254-9. PubMed ID: 2283675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Evaluation of the myocardial ischemic and arrhythmogenic risk of digitalized angiography by venous route. Apropos of a comparative trial of ioxaglate and iopamidol]. Baudouy PY; Lasry JL; Lagneau P; Abassade P; Valleteau de Moulliac M J Radiol; 1988 Mar; 69(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 3292761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differential effects of the iodinated contrast agents Ioxaglate, Iohexol and Iodixanol on thrombus formation and fibrinolysis. Jones CI; Goodall AH Thromb Res; 2003; 112(1-2):65-71. PubMed ID: 15013276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Conclusion of recent 'osmolality trials' in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy by NAC--what is the standard? Jo SH; Koo BK; Youn TJ; Kim HS Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Jul; 23(7):2424; author reply 2424-5. PubMed ID: 18445639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]