These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18081871)

  • 1. Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique.
    van Staden RC; Guan H; Johnson NW; Loo YC; Meredith N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 18081871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on periimplant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter, short implant and a narrow-diameter, long implant.
    Chou HY; Müftü S; Bozkaya D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 20970535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
    Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis.
    Satoh T; Maeda Y; Komiyama Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16161737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
    Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pilot-hole preparation for proper implant positioning and the enhancement of bone formation.
    Horiuchi M; Ichikawa T; Kanitani HWigianto R; Kawamoto N; Matsumoto N
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8699525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Li D; Hou R; Yang J; Liu B
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 18205741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of dental implant torque with a fast and automatic finite element analysis: a pilot study.
    Bardyn T; Gédet P; Hallermann W; Büchler P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):594-603. PubMed ID: 20163974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.