These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18081908)

  • 1. Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Puell MC; Barrio A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 18081908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: the SEE study.
    Rubin GS; Ng ES; Bandeen-Roche K; Keyl PM; Freeman EE; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17389475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and achromatic standard automated perimetry in patients with migraine without aura and controls].
    Göbel K; Boyraz M; Schröder A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Aug; 225(8):718-22. PubMed ID: 18712657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer.
    Edwards JD; Vance DE; Wadley VG; Cissell GM; Roenker DL; Ball KK
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 27(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 16019630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Realini T; Lai MQ; Barber L
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of prolonged wakefulness combined with alcohol and hands-free cell phone divided attention tasks on simulated driving.
    Iudice A; Bonanni E; Gelli A; Frittelli C; Iudice G; Cignoni F; Ghicopulos I; Murri L
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2005 Mar; 20(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 15651054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kook MS; Yang SJ; Kim S; Chung J; Kim ST; Tchah H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15234286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Driving with distraction in Parkinson disease.
    Uc EY; Rizzo M; Anderson SW; Sparks JD; Rodnitzky RL; Dawson JD
    Neurology; 2006 Nov; 67(10):1774-80. PubMed ID: 17130409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of auditory and visual distracters on the useful field of view: implications for the driving task.
    Wood J; Chaparro A; Hickson L; Thyer N; Carter P; Hancock J; Hoe A; Le I; Sahetapy L; Ybarzabal F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4646-50. PubMed ID: 17003463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of moderate smoking on the central visual field.
    Akarsu C; Yazici B; Taner P; Ergin A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Aug; 82(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 15291937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers.
    Ball K; Owsley C; Sloane ME; Roenker DL; Bruni JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 34(11):3110-23. PubMed ID: 8407219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation.
    Parikh R; Muliyil J; George R; Bhat S; Thomas R
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population.
    Becker K; Semes L
    Optometry; 2003 Mar; 74(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 12645850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension.
    Centofanti M; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; Orzalesi N; Vetrugno M; Manni G; Rossetti L
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 18794676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual field attention is reduced by concomitant hands-free conversation on a cellular telephone.
    Barkana Y; Zadok D; Morad Y; Avni I
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 15364215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of frequency-doubling perimetry in young children.
    Blumenthal EZ; Haddad A; Horani A; Anteby I
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 15019315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.