263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18082463)
1. Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique.
Mahar AT; Bagheri R; Oka R; Kostial P; Akbarnia BA
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 18082463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New rod-plate anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: biomechanical evaluation compared with dual-rod and single-rod with structural interbody support.
Zhang H; Johnston CE; Pierce WA; Ashman RB; Bronson DG; Haideri NF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):E934-40. PubMed ID: 17139209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel technique for surgical repair of spondylolysis in adolescents.
Ulibarri JA; Anderson PA; Escarcega T; Mann D; Noonan KJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2067-72. PubMed ID: 16915090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Novel dual-rod screw for thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation: biomechanical evaluation compared with single-rod and double-screw/double-rod anterior constructs.
Zhang H; Sucato DJ; Pierce WA; Ross D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E183-8. PubMed ID: 19247158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fixation.
Rose PS; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Mulconrey DS; Cronen GA; Buchowski JM; Schwend RM; Sides BA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):852-7; discussion 858. PubMed ID: 19365256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.
Liljenqvist U; Hackenberg L; Link T; Halm H
Acta Orthop Belg; 2001 Apr; 67(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11383294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of the screw-bone interface: optimization of 1 and 2 screw constructs by varying screw diameter.
Mohamad F; Oka R; Mahar A; Wedemeyer M; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(16):E535-9. PubMed ID: 16845339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical study of top screw pullout in anterior scoliosis correction constructs.
Mayo AE; Labrom RD; Askin GN; Adam CJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):E587-95. PubMed ID: 20461033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. All pedicle screw instrumentation for Scheuermann's kyphosis correction: is it worth it?
Koptan WM; Elmiligui YH; Elsebaie HB
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18640879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of thoracic scoliosis: are monoaxial thoracic pedicle screws the best form of fixation for correction?
Lonner BS; Auerbach JD; Boachie-Adjei O; Shah SA; Hosogane N; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):845-51. PubMed ID: 19365255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of posterior distraction forces on anterior column intradiscal pressure in the dual growing rod technique.
Mahar A; Kabirian N; Akbarnia BA; Flippin M; Tomlinson T; Kostial P; Bagheri R
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jan; 20(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 25270017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.
van Laar W; Meester RJ; Smit TH; van Royen BJ
Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1209-14. PubMed ID: 17203270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of end screw orientation on the stability of anterior instrumentation in cyclic lateral bending.
RodrÃguez-Olaverri JC; Hasharoni A; DeWal H; Nuzzo RM; Kummer FJ; Errico TJ
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 16153585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
