422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18083475)
1. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
Chen PT; Sung CS; Wang CC; Chan KH; Chang WK; Hsu WH
J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
Kamat A; Kramer P; Soisson AP
W V Med J; 2002; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
Jablon LK; Ugolini KR; Nahmias NC
Am J Surg; 2006 Jul; 192(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16769277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
Sarzo G; Finco C; Parise P; Savastano S; Vecchiato M; Degregori S; Merigliano S
Chir Ital; 2004; 56(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 15287644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
Hsu CC; Kwan GN; Evans-Barns H; Rophael JA; van Driel ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of the functional survival in chronic renal insufficiency of Permcath jugular catheters according to their mode of insertion].
Vanel T; Charra B; Chazot C; Jean G; Laurent G
Nephrologie; 1994; 15(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8047218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
Henriques HF; Karmy-Jones R; Knoll SM; Copes WS; Giordano JM
Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A modified supraclavicular approach for central venous catheterization by manipulation of ventilation in ventilated patients.
Chen PT; Yen CR; Wang CC; Sung CS; Chang WK; Chan KH
Semin Dial; 2008; 21(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 18764796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
Karanlik H; Kurul S
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases.
Chang HM; Hsieh CB; Hsieh HF; Chen TW; Chen CJ; Chan DC; Yu JC; Liu YC; Shen KL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Feb; 32(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 16289481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture. Technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
D'Angelo FA
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(2):313. PubMed ID: 12744114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative central venous route for cardiac surgery: supraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization.
Kocum A; Sener M; Calıskan E; Bozdogan N; Atalay H; Aribogan A
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1018-23. PubMed ID: 21474338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device.
Orci LA; Meier RP; Morel P; Staszewicz W; Toso C
Br J Surg; 2014 Jan; 101(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 24276950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open insertion of right atrial catheters through the jugular veins.
Raaf JH; Heil D
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 8395086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein
Iorio O; Gazzanelli S; D'Ermo G; Pezzolla A; Gurrado A; Testini M; De Toma G; Cavallaro G
Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29981612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
