555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18083494)
21. Multimodality monitoring of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory-evoked potentials during surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy and other neuromuscular disorders.
DiCindio S; Theroux M; Shah S; Miller F; Dabney K; Brislin RP; Schwartz D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1851-5; discussion 1855-6. PubMed ID: 12923474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pattern-specific changes and discordant prognostic values of individual leg-muscle motor evoked potentials during spinal surgery.
Kim SM; Yang H; Park SB; Han SG; Park KW; Yoon SH; Hyun SJ; Kim HJ; Park KS; Lee KW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 123(7):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22227063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery for aneurysms of the sylvian artery].
Lazorthes Y; Sonilhac F; Lagarrigue J; Scavazza R
Neurochirurgie; 1992; 38(6):333-46. PubMed ID: 1306888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The significance of intraoperative monitoring of muscle motor evoked potentials during unruptured large and giant cerebral aneurysm surgery.
Takebayashi S; Kamiyama H; Takizawa K; Kobayashi T; Saitoh N
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2014; 54(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 24390185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting intraoperative feasibility of combined TES-mMEP and cSSEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery based on preoperative neurophysiological assessment.
Azabou E; Manel V; Abelin-Genevois K; Andre-Obadia N; Cunin V; Garin C; Kohler R; Berard J; Ulkatan S
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1214-20. PubMed ID: 24200409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Upper-limb somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in lumbosacral spine surgery: a prognostic marker for position-related ulnar nerve injury.
Chung I; Glow JA; Dimopoulos V; Walid MS; Smisson HF; Johnston KW; Robinson JS; Grigorian AA
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 18684675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Preoperative direct cortical and sub-cortical electric stimulation during cerebral surgery in functional areas].
Duffau H; Capelle L; Sichez JP; Bitar A; Faillot T; Arthuis F; Van Effenterre R; Fohanno D
Rev Neurol (Paris); 1999 Sep; 155(8):553-68. PubMed ID: 10486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery.
Lieberman JA; Lyon R; Feiner J; Hu SS; Berven SH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):E414-24. PubMed ID: 18520928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Monitoring of motor pathways during brain stem surgery: what we have achieved and what we still miss?
Sala F; Manganotti P; Tramontano V; Bricolo A; Gerosa M
Neurophysiol Clin; 2007 Dec; 37(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 18083495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simultaneous direct cortical motor evoked potential monitoring and subcortical mapping for motor pathway preservation during brain tumor surgery: is it useful?
Landazuri P; Eccher M
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Dec; 30(6):623-5. PubMed ID: 24300989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors predicting the feasibility of monitoring lower-limb muscle motor evoked potentials in patients undergoing excision of spinal cord tumors.
Rajshekhar V; Velayutham P; Joseph M; Babu KS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 21438657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of reliability of post-tetanic motor-evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery under general anesthesia.
Hayashi H; Kawaguchi M; Yamamoto Y; Inoue S; Koizumi M; Ueda Y; Takakura Y; Furuya H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 19092611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel threshold criterion in transcranial motor evoked potentials during surgery for gliomas close to the motor pathway.
Abboud T; Schaper M; Dührsen L; Schwarz C; Schmidt NO; Westphal M; Martens T
J Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 125(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 26799297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Transcranial motor evoked potentials monitoring for cerebral aneurysm surgery].
Yamashita S; Sasaki O; Suzuki K; Takao T; Nakamura K; Koike T
No Shinkei Geka; 2013 Jan; 41(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 23269251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transcranial stimulation parameters to elicit motor evoked potentials.
Haghighi SS
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006; 46(7-8):409-12. PubMed ID: 17191733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Repetitive vs. single transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of motor conduction in spine surgery.
Haghighi SS; Gaines RW
Mo Med; 2003; 100(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 12847868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are there false-negative results of motor evoked potential monitoring in brain surgery?
Neuloh G; Schramm J
Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2009 Nov; 70(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 19851956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The refractory period of fast conducting corticospinal tract axons in man and its implications for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials.
Novak K; de Camargo AB; Neuwirth M; Kothbauer K; Amassian VE; Deletis V
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Aug; 115(8):1931-41. PubMed ID: 15261873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ischemia changes and tolerance ratio of evoked potential monitoring in intracranial aneurysm surgery.
Kang D; Yao P; Wu Z; Yu L
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2013 May; 115(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 22795547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Neuroprotective role of neurophysiological monitoring during endovascular procedures in the brain and spinal cord.
Sala F; Beltramello A; Gerosa M
Neurophysiol Clin; 2007 Dec; 37(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 18083497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
