290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18083720)
1. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating mean exposures from censored data: exposure to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry.
Glass DC; Gray CN
Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jun; 45(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 11378148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of health risks associated with occupational radiation exposure: addressing measurement error and minimum detectable exposure level.
Xue X; Kim MY; Shore RE
Health Phys; 2006 Dec; 91(6):582-91. PubMed ID: 17099402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of lognormally distributed exposure data with repeated measures and values below the limit of detection using SAS.
Jin Y; Hein MJ; Deddens JA; Hines CJ
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jan; 55(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 21177260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of censored exposure data by constrained maximization of the Shapiro-Wilk W statistic.
Flynn MR
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 19955326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of statistical methods for estimation of less than detectable ionising radiation exposures.
Daniels RD; Yiin JH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 16517566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for estimating occupational radiation dose to individuals, using weekly dosimetry data.
Mitchell TJ; Ostrouchov G; Frome EL; Kerr GD
Radiat Res; 1997 Feb; 147(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 9008212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of maximum likelihood procedures to estimate left censored observations.
Jain RB; Caudill SP; Wang RY; Monsell E
Anal Chem; 2008 Feb; 80(4):1124-32. PubMed ID: 18197633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of censoring on cancer risk estimates based on the Canadian National Dose Registry of occupational radiation exposure.
Shin H; Ramsay T; Krewski D; Zielinski JM
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 15(5):398-406. PubMed ID: 15592443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of site profiles for dose reconstruction used in worker compensation claims.
Kenoyer JL; Scalsky ED; Taulbee TD
Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18545029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-dosimetry algorithm for workers in interventional radiology.
Clerinx P; Buls N; Bosmans H; de Mey J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18426849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. State-of-the-art dosimetric methods for internal and external exposures: conclusions of a EURADOS action.
Lopez MA; Castellani CM; Currivan L; van Dijk J; Falk R; Olko P; Wernli C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):41-6. PubMed ID: 17213216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quantification of uncertainties in internal doses assessed from monitoring measurements.
Etherington G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17237184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of occupational exposures to natural radiation in the Czech Republic.
Neznal M; Zenatá I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 18407974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data.
Wei GC; Tanner MA
Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1297-309. PubMed ID: 1786320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the use of advanced numerical models for the evaluation of dosimetric parameters and the verification of exposure limits at workplaces.
Catarinucci L; Tarricone L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):218-22. PubMed ID: 19846463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
