These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18083993)

  • 1. Influence of the way results are presented on research interpretation and medical decision making: the PRIMER collaboration randomized studies.
    Shakespeare TP; Gebski V; Tang J; Lim K; Lu JJ; Zhang X; Jiang G
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 18083993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a spreadsheet for the calculation of new tools to improve the reporting of the results of medical research.
    Shakespeare TP; Gebski VJ; Thiagarajan A; Jay Lu J
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2006 Jun; 31(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16777786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical and clinical significance, and how to use confidence intervals to help interpret both.
    Fethney J
    Aust Crit Care; 2010 May; 23(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 20347326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How preliminary data affect people's stated willingness to enter a hypothetical randomized controlled trial.
    Ubel PA; Merz JF; Shea J; Asch DA
    J Investig Med; 1997 Dec; 45(9):561-6. PubMed ID: 9444883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical interpretation of statistical significance].
    López-Jiménez F
    Rev Invest Clin; 1996; 48(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 8966384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of an online evidence system on confidence in decision making in a controlled setting.
    Westbrook JI; Gosling AS; Coiera EW
    Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 15800302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical versus statistical significance: interpreting P values and confidence intervals related to measures of association to guide decision making.
    Ferrill MJ; Brown DA; Kyle JA
    J Pharm Pract; 2010 Aug; 23(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 21507834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The undue influence of significant p-values on the perceived importance of study results.
    Bhandari M; Montori VM; Schemitsch EH
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 16156453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are clinicians correct when they believe they are correct? Implications for medical decision support.
    Friedman C; Gatti G; Elstein A; Franz T; Murphy G; Wolf F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):454-8. PubMed ID: 11604781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretation of subgroup results in clinical trial publications: insights from a survey of medical specialists in Ontario, Canada.
    Parker AB; Naylor CD
    Am Heart J; 2006 Mar; 151(3):580-8. PubMed ID: 16504618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient decision aids to support clinical decision making: evaluating the decision or the outcomes of the decision.
    McCaffery K; Irwig L; Bossuyt P
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 17873254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
    Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for comparing the results of different studies.
    Eckert SE; Choi YG; Koka S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 14579958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to deal with multiple treatment or dose groups in randomized clinical trials?
    Hothorn LA
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 17391286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence intervals and p-values in clinical decision making.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2008 Aug; 97(8):1004-7. PubMed ID: 18462462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].
    Taube A; Malmquist J
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jul; 98(28-29):3208-11. PubMed ID: 11496808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of context in malaria diagnosis and treatment decisions - a quantitative analysis of observed clinical encounters in Tanzania.
    Chandler CI; Chonya S; Boniface G; Juma K; Reyburn H; Whitty CJ
    Trop Med Int Health; 2008 Sep; 13(9):1131-42. PubMed ID: 18631313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of rare events: an update and sensitivity analysis of cardiovascular events in randomized trials of rosiglitazone.
    Dahabreh IJ; Economopoulos K
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 18375649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ascribing intentions in clinical decision-making.
    Jansen LA; Fogel JS
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Jan; 36(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 20026685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.