These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18084367)

  • 1. [Genital Chlamydia--can we rely on the figures?].
    Skaare D; Tveten Y; Kristiansen BE
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Dec; 127(24):3232-4. PubMed ID: 18084367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [False positive tests of sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infections].
    Ezazi S; Ezazi S; Aavitsland P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Oct; 115(25):3145-7. PubMed ID: 8539698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the new COBAS TaqMan CT test v2.0 and impact on the proportion of new variant Chlamydia trachomatis by the introduction of diagnostics detecting new variant C trachomatis in Orebro county, Sweden.
    Hadad R; Fredlund H; Unemo M
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 19060034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice?].
    Aavitsland P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Aug; 112(18):2388-9. PubMed ID: 1412246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of bacterial vaginosis on detection of chlamydial infection.
    Ward H; Taylor-Robinson D
    Int J STD AIDS; 2004 Mar; 15(3):209-10. PubMed ID: 15038873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [About Chlamydia].
    Bech B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Aug; 168(33):2685; author 2685. PubMed ID: 16953545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chlamydia screening in non-clinical settings.
    Durber L; Oakeshott P; Prime K; Hay P
    Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Jun; 21(6):449-50. PubMed ID: 20606230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Tracing young men is difficult. Is screening for asymptomatic genital Chlamydia infection justified?].
    Weström L
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Jun; 91(23):2313-6. PubMed ID: 8057706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid deletion mutant--what does it mean to us?
    Schachter J
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 May; 34(5):257. PubMed ID: 17483724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The risk of false positive Chlamydia tests should be empirically determinated].
    Melbye H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Nov; 115(28):3549-50. PubMed ID: 7491612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment of the commercial home Chlamydia test].
    Andersen B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Oct; 168(41):3540. PubMed ID: 17066536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitfalls of internet-accessible diagnostic tests: inadequate performance of a CE-marked Chlamydia test for home use.
    Michel CE; Saison FG; Joshi H; Mahilum-Tapay LM; Lee HH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 19398434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in norway, 1986 to 2006, surveillance data.
    Kløvstad H; Aavitsland P
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jan; 36(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 18923334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Screening for Chlamydia].
    Bleker OP; van der Meijden WI
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jul; 149(31):1764; author reply 1764-5. PubMed ID: 16114296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can we climb out of the "pit" of poorly performing rapid diagnostic tests for chlamydia?
    Gaydos CA
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):158. PubMed ID: 19478102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Rasmussen KL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Jul; 158(27):3952. PubMed ID: 8701515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9097):217-8. PubMed ID: 9449898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do?
    Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Handilab C Chlamydia for home testing is not what it claims].
    Moi H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Aug; 127(16):2083-5. PubMed ID: 17717571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Punching above their weight: males, reinfection, and the limited success of Chlamydia screening programs.
    Greer AL; Fisman DN
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jan; 36(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 19077920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.