BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18085188)

  • 1. Reduction of metal artefacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Vandevenne JE; Vanhoenacker FM; Parizel PM; Butts Pauly K; Lang RK
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 18085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Harris CA; White LM
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2006 Jul; 37(3):349-59, vi. PubMed ID: 16846766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
    Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing imaging techniques in the postoperative patient.
    Buckwalter KA
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2007 Sep; 11(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 18260036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques.
    Kolind SH; MacKay AL; Munk PL; Xiang QS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Sep; 20(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 15332257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: the effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters.
    Ganapathi M; Joseph G; Savage R; Jones AR; Timms B; Lyons K
    J Hand Surg Br; 2002 Apr; 27(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12027494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants.
    Koch KM; Hargreaves BA; Pauly KB; Chen W; Gold GE; King KF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):773-87. PubMed ID: 20882607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metal artefact reduction in MRI at both 1.5 and 3.0 T using slice encoding for metal artefact correction and view angle tilting.
    Reichert M; Ai T; Morelli JN; Nittka M; Attenberger U; Runge VM
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 88(1048):20140601. PubMed ID: 25613398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
    Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental and computational analyses of the effects of slice distortion from a metallic sphere in an MRI phantom.
    Hopper TA; Vasilić B; Pope JM; Jones CE; Epstein CL; Song HK; Wehrli FW
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Oct; 24(8):1077-85. PubMed ID: 16997078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing postoperative artifacts on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Buckwalter KA; Lin C; Ford JM
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2011 Sep; 15(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 21928156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Talbot BS; Weinberg EP
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 26587889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.
    Lee MJ; Kim S; Lee SA; Song HT; Huh YM; Kim DH; Han SH; Suh JS
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):791-803. PubMed ID: 17495293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
    Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws.
    Petersilge CA; Lewin JS; Duerk JL; Yoo JU; Ghaneyem AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1213-8. PubMed ID: 8615272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI.
    Butts K; Pauly JM; Gold GE
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Feb; 53(2):418-24. PubMed ID: 15678535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of metal artefact reduction (MAR) sequences for MRI of total hip prostheses.
    Toms AP; Smith-Bateman C; Malcolm PN; Cahir J; Graves M
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Jun; 65(6):447-52. PubMed ID: 20451011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metal artifacts caused by gradient switching.
    Graf H; Steidle G; Martirosian P; Lauer UA; Schick F
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Jul; 54(1):231-4. PubMed ID: 15968663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.