BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

691 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18085480)

  • 1. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
    Godish D; Godish T
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fungal contamination of elementary schools: a new environmental hazard.
    Santilli J; Rockwell W
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2003 Feb; 90(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 12602667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations.
    Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 326(1-3):123-41. PubMed ID: 15142771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fungal spore source strength tester: laboratory evaluation of a new concept.
    Sivasubramani SK; Niemeier RT; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Aug; 329(1-3):75-86. PubMed ID: 15262159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):724-34. PubMed ID: 18780236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the aerosolization potential for fungal spores in moldy homes.
    Sivasubramani SK; Niemeier RT; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 15500633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing pollen and spore counts collected with the Rotorod Sampler and Burkard spore trap.
    Frenz DA
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 Nov; 83(5):341-7; quiz 348-9. PubMed ID: 10582712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of fungal contamination in moldy homes: comparison of different methods.
    Niemeier RT; Sivasubramani SK; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 May; 3(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 16595378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents.
    Yao M; Mainelis G
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 16912697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating fungal populations by genera/species on wide body commercial passenger aircraft and in airport terminals.
    McKernan LT; Burge H; Wallingford KM; Hein MJ; Herrick R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Apr; 51(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 17351266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability of airborne microflora in a hospital ward within a period of one year.
    Augustowska M; Dutkiewicz J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 16841880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Burkard and Allergenco MK-3 volumetric collectors.
    Portnoy J; Landuyt J; Pacheco F; Flappan S; Simon S; Barnes C
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2000 Jan; 84(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10674560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Airborne fungi in the homes of children with asthma in low-income urban communities: The Inner-City Asthma Study.
    O'connor GT; Walter M; Mitchell H; Kattan M; Morgan WJ; Gruchalla RS; Pongracic JA; Smartt E; Stout JW; Evans R; Crain EF; Burge HA
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 15356564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of environmental factors on airborne fungi in houses of Santa Fe City, Argentina.
    Basilico Mde L; Chiericatti C; Aringoli EE; Althaus RL; Basilico JC
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 376(1-3):143-50. PubMed ID: 17320936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A small change in the design of a slit bioaerosol impactor significantly improves its collection characteristics.
    Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Cho SH; Kim KY; Lee T; Reponen T
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Aug; 9(8):855-61. PubMed ID: 17671667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of sampling height on the concentration of airborne fungal spores.
    Khattab A; Levetin E
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2008 Nov; 101(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 19055208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A side-by-side comparison of Rotorod and Burkard pollen and spore collections.
    Crisp HC; Gomez RA; White KM; Quinn JM
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2013 Aug; 111(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 23886230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.