These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18085612)

  • 1. Hospital lymph node counts and survival after radical cystectomy.
    Hollenbeck BK; Ye Z; Wong SL; Montie JE; Birkmeyer JD
    Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(4):806-12. PubMed ID: 18085612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.
    Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP
    Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations between comorbidity, and overall survival and bladder cancer specific survival after radical cystectomy: results from the Alberta Urology Institute Radical Cystectomy database.
    Fairey AS; Jacobsen NE; Chetner MP; Mador DR; Metcalfe JB; Moore RB; Rourke KF; Todd GT; Venner PM; Voaklander DC; Estey EP
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):85-92; discussion 93. PubMed ID: 19447413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lymph node yield at radical cystectomy predicts mortality in node-negative and not node-positive patients.
    Morgan TM; Barocas DA; Penson DF; Chang SS; Ni S; Clark PE; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):632-40. PubMed ID: 22795379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Staging error does not explain the relationship between the number of lymph nodes in a colon cancer specimen and survival.
    Moore J; Hyman N; Callas P; Littenberg B
    Surgery; 2010 Mar; 147(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 19962166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of lymph node density in predicting survival of patients with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional study.
    Osawa T; Abe T; Shinohara N; Harabayashi T; Sazawa A; Kubota K; Matsuno Y; Shibata T; Shinno Y; Kamota S; Minami K; Sakashita S; Kumagai A; Mori T; Nonomura K
    Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):274-8; discussion 278. PubMed ID: 19087211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing aggressive therapy for bladder cancer: an analysis of data from the SEER program.
    Konety BR; Joslyn SA
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1765-71. PubMed ID: 14532772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program data base.
    Konety BR; Joslyn SA; O'Donnell MA
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):946-50. PubMed ID: 12576819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival.
    Dotan ZA; Kavanagh K; Yossepowitch O; Kaag M; Olgac S; Donat M; Herr HW
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2308-12; discussion 2313. PubMed ID: 17936804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.
    Bui L; Rempel E; Reeson D; Simunovic M
    J Surg Oncol; 2006 May; 93(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 16615148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the relevance of lymph node density in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
    Kassouf W; Leibovici D; Munsell MF; Dinney CP; Grossman HB; Kamat AM
    J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):53-7; discussion 57. PubMed ID: 16753366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer.
    Wong SL; Ji H; Hollenbeck BK; Morris AM; Baser O; Birkmeyer JD
    JAMA; 2007 Nov; 298(18):2149-54. PubMed ID: 18000198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database.
    Groth SS; Virnig BA; Whitson BA; DeFor TE; Li ZZ; Tuttle TM; Maddaus MA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 139(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 19709685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report.
    Herr HW; Faulkner JR; Grossman HB; Natale RB; deVere White R; Sarosdy MF; Crawford ED
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jul; 22(14):2781-9. PubMed ID: 15199091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
    Stein JP
    Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 2002 TNM nodal status with lymph node density in node-positive patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: analysis by the number of lymph nodes removed.
    Jeong IG; Park J; Song K; Ro JY; Song C; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 19556153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of procedure volume with radical cystectomy outcomes in a nationwide database.
    Barbieri CE; Lee B; Cookson MS; Bingham J; Clark PE; Smith JA; Chang SS
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1418-21; discussion 1421-2. PubMed ID: 17706712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term oncological outcomes in women undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic diversion for bladder cancer.
    Stein JP; Penson DF; Lee C; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner DG
    J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2052-8; discussion 2058-9. PubMed ID: 19286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital-to-hospital variation in lymph node detection after colorectal resection.
    Miller EA; Woosley J; Martin CF; Sandler RS
    Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5):1065-71. PubMed ID: 15329917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer.
    Stein JP; Penson DF; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner EC; Dunn MA; Groshen S; Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):876-81; discussion 881-2. PubMed ID: 17296365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.