265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18085612)
1. Hospital lymph node counts and survival after radical cystectomy.
Hollenbeck BK; Ye Z; Wong SL; Montie JE; Birkmeyer JD
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(4):806-12. PubMed ID: 18085612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.
Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Associations between comorbidity, and overall survival and bladder cancer specific survival after radical cystectomy: results from the Alberta Urology Institute Radical Cystectomy database.
Fairey AS; Jacobsen NE; Chetner MP; Mador DR; Metcalfe JB; Moore RB; Rourke KF; Todd GT; Venner PM; Voaklander DC; Estey EP
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):85-92; discussion 93. PubMed ID: 19447413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymph node yield at radical cystectomy predicts mortality in node-negative and not node-positive patients.
Morgan TM; Barocas DA; Penson DF; Chang SS; Ni S; Clark PE; Smith JA; Cookson MS
Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):632-40. PubMed ID: 22795379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staging error does not explain the relationship between the number of lymph nodes in a colon cancer specimen and survival.
Moore J; Hyman N; Callas P; Littenberg B
Surgery; 2010 Mar; 147(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 19962166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of lymph node density in predicting survival of patients with lymph node metastases after radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional study.
Osawa T; Abe T; Shinohara N; Harabayashi T; Sazawa A; Kubota K; Matsuno Y; Shibata T; Shinno Y; Kamota S; Minami K; Sakashita S; Kumagai A; Mori T; Nonomura K
Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):274-8; discussion 278. PubMed ID: 19087211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing aggressive therapy for bladder cancer: an analysis of data from the SEER program.
Konety BR; Joslyn SA
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1765-71. PubMed ID: 14532772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program data base.
Konety BR; Joslyn SA; O'Donnell MA
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):946-50. PubMed ID: 12576819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival.
Dotan ZA; Kavanagh K; Yossepowitch O; Kaag M; Olgac S; Donat M; Herr HW
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2308-12; discussion 2313. PubMed ID: 17936804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.
Bui L; Rempel E; Reeson D; Simunovic M
J Surg Oncol; 2006 May; 93(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 16615148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the relevance of lymph node density in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
Kassouf W; Leibovici D; Munsell MF; Dinney CP; Grossman HB; Kamat AM
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):53-7; discussion 57. PubMed ID: 16753366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer.
Wong SL; Ji H; Hollenbeck BK; Morris AM; Baser O; Birkmeyer JD
JAMA; 2007 Nov; 298(18):2149-54. PubMed ID: 18000198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database.
Groth SS; Virnig BA; Whitson BA; DeFor TE; Li ZZ; Tuttle TM; Maddaus MA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 139(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 19709685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report.
Herr HW; Faulkner JR; Grossman HB; Natale RB; deVere White R; Sarosdy MF; Crawford ED
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jul; 22(14):2781-9. PubMed ID: 15199091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
Stein JP
Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 2002 TNM nodal status with lymph node density in node-positive patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: analysis by the number of lymph nodes removed.
Jeong IG; Park J; Song K; Ro JY; Song C; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 19556153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of procedure volume with radical cystectomy outcomes in a nationwide database.
Barbieri CE; Lee B; Cookson MS; Bingham J; Clark PE; Smith JA; Chang SS
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1418-21; discussion 1421-2. PubMed ID: 17706712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term oncological outcomes in women undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic diversion for bladder cancer.
Stein JP; Penson DF; Lee C; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2052-8; discussion 2058-9. PubMed ID: 19286213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital-to-hospital variation in lymph node detection after colorectal resection.
Miller EA; Woosley J; Martin CF; Sandler RS
Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5):1065-71. PubMed ID: 15329917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer.
Stein JP; Penson DF; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner EC; Dunn MA; Groshen S; Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):876-81; discussion 881-2. PubMed ID: 17296365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
