These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18085917)

  • 41. Overshadowing between landmarks on the touchscreen and in arena with pigeons.
    Leising KJ; Garlick D; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 21604908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Minding the gap: spatial perseveration error in dogs.
    Osthaus B; Marlow D; Ducat P
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Nov; 13(6):881-5. PubMed ID: 20563828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Strategies in landmark use by orangutans and human children.
    Marsh HL; Spetch ML; MacDonald SE
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jul; 14(4):487-502. PubMed ID: 21312049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dogs discriminate between barks: the effect of context and identity of the caller.
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Faragó T; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 19596426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils.
    Collett TS; Cartwright BA; Smith BA
    J Comp Physiol A; 1986 Jun; 158(6):835-51. PubMed ID: 3735168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts.
    Foo P; Warren WH; Duchon A; Tarr MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 15755239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Flexible use of spatial cues in the southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans).
    Gibbs SE; Lea SE; Jacobs LF
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 17265151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.
    Du Y; McMillan N; Madan CR; Spetch ML; Mou W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1857-1871. PubMed ID: 28504533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reorienting strategies in a rectangular array of landmarks by domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).
    Pecchia T; Vallortigara G
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 May; 124(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 20476814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparing black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli): use of geometric and featural information in a spatial orientation task.
    Batty ER; Bloomfield LL; Spetch ML; Sturdy CB
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Jul; 12(4):633-41. PubMed ID: 19381699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pigeons' (Columba livia) hierarchical organization of local and global cues in touch screen tasks.
    Legge EL; Spetch ML; Batty ER
    Behav Processes; 2009 Feb; 80(2):128-39. PubMed ID: 19022355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spatial encoding of hidden objects in dogs (Canis familiaris).
    Fiset S; Gagnon S; Beaulieu C
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Dec; 114(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 11149535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) remember the location of a hidden food item after altering their orientation to a spatial array.
    Hoffman ML; Beran MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Nov; 120(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 17115859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Incidental spatial memory in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).
    Sluka CM; Stanko K; Campbell A; Cáceres J; Panoz-Brown D; Wheeler A; Bradley J; Allen C
    Learn Behav; 2018 Dec; 46(4):513-521. PubMed ID: 29845456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Flexible cue use in food-caching birds.
    LaDage LD; Roth TC; Fox RA; Pravosudov VV
    Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 19050946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Object permanence in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and gray wolves (Canis lupus).
    Fiset S; Plourde V
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 May; 127(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 23106804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sensory preconditioning in spatial learning using a touch screen task in pigeons.
    Sawa K; Leising KJ; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 16045391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Context cues eliminate retroactive interference effects in honeybees Apis mellifera.
    Cheng K
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Mar; 208(Pt 6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 15767303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pigeon (Columba livia) encoding of a goal location: the relative importance of shape geometry and slope information.
    Nardi D; Bingman VP
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 May; 123(2):204-16. PubMed ID: 19450027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners.
    Schwab C; Huber L
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 16893253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.