These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18085958)
1. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information. van Linden S; Vroomen J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1483-94. PubMed ID: 18085958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech: measuring aftereffects after a 24-hour delay. Vroomen J; Baart M Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):341-50. PubMed ID: 19624035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phonetic recalibration only occurs in speech mode. Vroomen J; Baart M Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 19059584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lipread-induced phonetic recalibration in dyslexia. Baart M; de Boer-Schellekens L; Vroomen J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 22484551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phonetic recalibration of speech by text. Keetels M; Schakel L; Bonte M; Vroomen J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):938-45. PubMed ID: 26704562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do you see what you are hearing? Cross-modal effects of speech sounds on lipreading. Baart M; Vroomen J Neurosci Lett; 2010 Mar; 471(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 20080146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recalibration of auditory phonemes by lipread speech is ear-specific. Keetels M; Pecoraro M; Vroomen J Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():121-6. PubMed ID: 25981732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lexically guided retuning of visual phonetic categories. van der Zande P; Jesse A; Cutler A J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):562-71. PubMed ID: 23862831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Selective Deficit in Phonetic Recalibration by Text in Developmental Dyslexia. Keetels M; Bonte M; Vroomen J Front Psychol; 2018; 9():710. PubMed ID: 29867675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation. Ullas S; Formisano E; Eisner F; Cutler A Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):707-715. PubMed ID: 32319002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Adaptation as Induced by Lexical and Audiovisual Context. Ullas S; Hausfeld L; Cutler A; Eisner F; Formisano E J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 32(11):2145-2158. PubMed ID: 32662723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Pitt MA; Samuel AG Cogn Psychol; 1995 Oct; 29(2):149-88. PubMed ID: 7587137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory. Baart M; Vroomen J Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 203(3):575-82. PubMed ID: 20437168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories. Drouin JR; Rojas JA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2700-2717. PubMed ID: 37188863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]