These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18085958)

  • 21. The neural bases of the lexical effect: an fMRI investigation.
    Myers EB; Blumstein SE
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):278-88. PubMed ID: 17504782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of voice onset time differences on lexical access in Dutch.
    van Alphen PM; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):178-96. PubMed ID: 16478335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptual development of phoneme contrasts: how sensitivity changes along acoustic dimensions that contrast phoneme categories.
    Heeren WF; Schouten ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2291-302. PubMed ID: 19062867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech.
    Ozdemir R; Roelofs A; Levelt WJ
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):457-65. PubMed ID: 17156770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lexical plasticity in early bilinguals does not alter phoneme categories: I. Neurodynamical modeling.
    Larsson JP; Constán FV; Sebastián-Gallés N; Deco G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 20(1):76-94. PubMed ID: 17919078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Alignment to visual speech information.
    Miller RM; Sanchez K; Rosenblum LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1614-25. PubMed ID: 20675805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Similarity ratings and confusability of lipread consonants compared with similarity ratings of auditory and orthographic stimuli.
    Manning SK; Shofner E
    Am J Psychol; 1991; 104(4):587-604. PubMed ID: 1793128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are the same phoneme and lexical layers used in speech production and comprehension? A case-series test of model of aphasic speech production.
    Hanley JR; Nickels L
    Cortex; 2009 Jun; 45(6):784-90. PubMed ID: 19103444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of syntax in perceptual compensation for phonological reduction.
    Tuinman A; Mitterer H; Cutler A
    Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):68-85. PubMed ID: 24754221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification of Phonemes: Differences between Phoneme Classes and the Effect of Class Size.
    Wagner A; Ernestus M
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(1-2):106-27. PubMed ID: 18523368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A phonetic explanation of pronunciation variant effects.
    Sumner M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL26-32. PubMed ID: 23862902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Phonological processing in deaf children: when lipreading and cues are incongruent.
    Alegria J; Lechat J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 15778209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses.
    Vroomen J; van Linden S; de Gelder B; Bertelson P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 16530233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic-Phonetic Versus Lexical Processing in Nonnative Listeners Differing in Their Dominant Language.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Sep; 25(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 27386797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Infants are sensitive to within-category variation in speech perception.
    McMurray B; Aslin RN
    Cognition; 2005 Mar; 95(2):B15-26. PubMed ID: 15694642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Testing the protracted lexical restructuring hypothesis: the effects of position and acoustic-phonetic clarity on sensitivity to mispronunciations in children and adults.
    Bowey JA; Hirakis E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16546204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consequences of lexical stress on learning an artificial lexicon.
    Creel SC; Tanenhaus MK; Aslin RN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):15-32. PubMed ID: 16478337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon.
    Chambers CG; Cooke H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1029-40. PubMed ID: 19586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.