These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18087116)

  • 1. Sound localization with communications headsets: comparison of passive and active systems.
    Abel SM; Tsang S; Boyne S
    Noise Health; 2007; 9(37):101-7. PubMed ID: 18087116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sound localization with an army helmet worn in combination with an in-ear advanced communications system.
    Abel SM; Boyne S; Roesler-Mulroney H
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(45):199-205. PubMed ID: 19805929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection.
    Abel SM; Hay VH
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 8658023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound source identification with ANR earmuffs.
    Abel SM; Shelly Paik JE
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(27):1-10. PubMed ID: 16105245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sound localization with hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Armstrong NM
    J Otolaryngol; 1993 Oct; 22(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 8283505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Active noise reduction versus conventional hearing protection. Relative benefits for normal-hearing and impaired listeners.
    Abel SM; Spencer DL
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(3):155-67. PubMed ID: 9309811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content.
    Alali KA; Casali JG
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):99-112. PubMed ID: 21368435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of binaural electronic hearing protectors on localization and response time to sounds in the horizontal plane.
    Carmichel EL; Harris FP; Story BH
    Noise Health; 2007; 9(37):83-95. PubMed ID: 18087114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of aging on horizontal plane sound localization.
    Abel SM; Giguère C; Consoli A; Papsin BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Aug; 108(2):743-52. PubMed ID: 10955641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect on directional hearing in hunters using amplifying (level dependent) hearing protectors.
    Borg E; Bergkvist C; Bagger-Sjöbäck D
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 18520633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of various hearing protectors on sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes.
    Noble W; Murray N; Waugh R
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Jul; 51(7):370-7. PubMed ID: 2382639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Hearing and Head Protection on the Localization of Tonal and Broadband Reverse Alarms.
    Laroche C; Giguère C; Vaillancourt V; Marleau C; Cadieux MF; Laprise-Girard K; Gula E; Carroll V; Bibeau M; Nélisse H
    Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 33596712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between subjective and objective measures of active hearing protector and communication headset attenuation.
    Zera J; Brammer AJ; Pan GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3486-97. PubMed ID: 9193042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory localization in the horizontal plane with single and double hearing protection.
    Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD; McKinley RL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 Sep; 74(9):937-46. PubMed ID: 14503671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Azimuthal auditory localization of gunshots in a realistic field environment: effects of open-ear versus hearing protection-enhancement devices (HPEDs), military vehicle noise, and hearing impairment.
    Talcott KA; Casali JG; Keady JP; Killion MC
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51 Suppl 1():S20-30. PubMed ID: 22264060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.