These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18087947)

  • 1. Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search: the roles of top-down and bottom-up processing.
    Sobel KV; Gerrie MP; Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):840-5. PubMed ID: 18087947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.
    Bleckley MK; Durso FT; Crutchfield JM; Engle RW; Khanna MM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):884-9. PubMed ID: 15000535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.
    Meier ME; Smeekens BA; Silvia PJ; Kwapil TR; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 28639800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory capacity and visual attention: top-down and bottom-up guidance.
    Shipstead Z; Harrison TL; Engle RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 22404647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural mechanisms of internal distraction suppression in visual attention.
    Rajan A; Meyyappan S; Walker H; Henry Samuel IB; Hu Z; Ding M
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():77-88. PubMed ID: 30933692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search: bottom-up or top-down?
    Patel GA; Sathian K
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D169-93. PubMed ID: 10702378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal Evidence for the Role of Neuronal Oscillations in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention.
    Riddle J; Hwang K; Cellier D; Dhanani S; D'Esposito M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 May; 31(5):768-779. PubMed ID: 30726180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Top-down but not bottom-up visual scanning is affected in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.
    Matsuda S; Matsumoto H; Furubayashi T; Fukuda H; Emoto M; Hanajima R; Tsuji S; Ugawa Y; Terao Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116181. PubMed ID: 25545148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: global versus local indices of executive control.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):748-759. PubMed ID: 22774858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1849-72. PubMed ID: 26120774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shared and distinct structure-function substrates of heterogenous distractor suppression ability between high and low working memory capacity individuals.
    Xie K; Jin Z; Jin DG; Zhang J; Li L
    Neuroimage; 2022 Oct; 260():119483. PubMed ID: 35842098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: possible contribution of top-down inhibitory control.
    Minamoto T; Osaka M; Osaka N
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1335():63-73. PubMed ID: 20381462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual selective attention is equally functional for individuals with low and high working memory capacity: evidence from accuracy and eye movements.
    Mall JT; Morey CC; Wolff MJ; Lehnert F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1998-2014. PubMed ID: 24402698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating working memory capacity and context-processing views of cognitive control.
    Redick TS; Engle RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1048-55. PubMed ID: 21644190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Gulbinaite R; Johnson A; de Jong R; Morey CC; van Rijn H
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():197-206. PubMed ID: 24878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent.
    Pinto Y; van der Leij AR; Sligte IG; Lamme VA; Scholte HS
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(3):16. PubMed ID: 23863334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correction to McVay and Kane (2012).
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):550. PubMed ID: 26030172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory capacity does not always support future-oriented mind-wandering.
    McVay JC; Unsworth N; McMillan BD; Kane MJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Mar; 67(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 23458550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.