These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18087956)

  • 1. Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions.
    Bröder A; Gaissmaier W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):895-900. PubMed ID: 18087956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When one cue is not enough: combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U; Dieckmann A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1197-215. PubMed ID: 17676553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format.
    Bröder A; Schiffer S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Jun; 132(2):277-93. PubMed ID: 12825641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additional information is not ignored: New evidence for information integration and inhibition in take-the-best decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():167-84. PubMed ID: 26687019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference.
    Bröder A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1332-46. PubMed ID: 11009261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing take-the-best in new and changing environments.
    Lee MD; Blanco G; Bo N
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1420-1431. PubMed ID: 27604600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does causal knowledge help us be faster and more frugal in our decisions?
    Garcia-Retamero R; Wallin A; Dieckmann A
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1399-409. PubMed ID: 18035636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic activation of attribute knowledge in heuristic inference from memory.
    Khader PH; Pachur T; Jost K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 23132606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Most people do not ignore salient invalid cues in memory-based decisions.
    Platzer C; Bröder A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 22555901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Take-the-best and the influence of decision-inconsistent attributes on decision confidence and choices in memory-based decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1435-43. PubMed ID: 26642913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategy selection in cue-based decision making.
    Bryant DJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 24884389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluent, fast, and frugal? A formal model evaluation of the interplay between memory, fluency, and comparative judgments.
    Hilbig BE; Erdfelder E; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):827-39. PubMed ID: 21355665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term serial position effects in cue-based inference.
    Lawrence A; Thomas R; Dougherty M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200821. PubMed ID: 30021017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids: a critical analysis.
    Pieterse AH; de Vries M
    Health Expect; 2013 Sep; 16(3):e73-9. PubMed ID: 21902770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing psychologically plausible choice models.
    Heck DW; Hilbig BE; Moshagen M
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():26-40. PubMed ID: 28601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making.
    Bergert FB; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):107-29. PubMed ID: 17201556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast or frugal, but not both: Decision heuristics under time pressure.
    Bobadilla-Suarez S; Love BC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 28557503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic inference under time pressure leads to a cortical-to-subcortical shift in decision evidence integration.
    Oh-Descher H; Beck JM; Ferrari S; Sommer MA; Egner T
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 162():138-150. PubMed ID: 28882633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence accumulation in decision making: unifying the "take the best" and the "rational" models.
    Lee MD; Cummins TD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 15260204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.