These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18089535)

  • 21. Field Crickets Compensate for Unattractive Static Long-Distance Call Components by Increasing Dynamic Signalling Effort.
    McAuley EM; Bertram SM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167311. PubMed ID: 27936045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Heritable variation in the timing of spermatophore removal, a mechanism of post-copulatory female choice in crickets.
    Mautz BS; Sakaluk SK
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1366-70. PubMed ID: 18544069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby.
    Lindström K; Lehtonen TK
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Aug; 280(1765):20130983. PubMed ID: 23804620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Condition-Dependent Mutual Mate Preference and Intersexual Genetic Correlations for Mating Activity.
    Han CS; Brooks RC; Dingemanse NJ
    Am Nat; 2020 Jun; 195(6):997-1008. PubMed ID: 32469657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Colour Cues That Are Not Directly Attached to the Body of Males Do Not Influence the Mate Choice of Zebra Finches.
    Krause ET
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167674. PubMed ID: 27977719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Female mate choice, male-male competition, and male sexual traits: Experimental study of sexual selection directedness in Campbell's dwarf hamster (Phodopus campbelli Thomas 1905)].
    Vasilieva NY; Shekarova ON; Khrushchova AM; Rogovin KA
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2017; 78(2):14-31. PubMed ID: 30024675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dominance is not always an honest signal of male quality, but females may be able to detect the dishonesty.
    Pölkki M; Kortet R; Hedrick A; Rantala MJ
    Biol Lett; 2013 Feb; 9(1):20121002. PubMed ID: 23234864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait.
    Hunt J; Brooks R; Jennions MD
    Am Nat; 2005 Jul; 166(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 15937791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproductive success in the Lusitanian toadfish: Influence of calling activity, male quality and experimental design.
    Amorim MC; Conti C; Sousa-Santos C; Novais B; Gouveia MD; Vicente JR; Modesto T; Gonçalves A; Fonseca PJ
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Mar; 155():17-24. PubMed ID: 26656765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chemical and visual communication during mate searching in rock shrimp.
    Díaz ER; Thiel M
    Biol Bull; 2004 Jun; 206(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 15198939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inbreeding and courtship calling in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus.
    Drayton JM; Milner RN; Hall MD; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 21054622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexual signal loss, pleiotropy, and maintenance of a male reproductive polymorphism in crickets.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Nichols RE; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2020 May; 74(5):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 32187385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Behaviour of Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus during an induced mating season in captivity: how male relative size influences male behavioural investment and female preference over time.
    Bolgan M; O'Brien J; Picciulin M; Manning L; Gammell M
    J Fish Biol; 2017 Apr; 90(4):1479-1505. PubMed ID: 28000210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Costly signals in a field cricket can indicate high- or low-quality direct benefits depending upon the environment.
    Tolle AE; Wagner WE
    Evolution; 2011 Jan; 65(1):283-94. PubMed ID: 20825479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lovesick: immunological costs of mating to male sagebrush crickets.
    Leman JC; Weddle CB; Gershman SN; Kerr AM; Ower GD; St John JM; Vogel LA; Sakaluk SK
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 19127612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of female cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile on male courtship behavior in two hybridizing field crickets Gryllus firmus and Gryllus pennsylvanicus.
    Heggeseth B; Sim D; Partida L; Maroja LS
    BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 32019492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. False promises: females spurn cheating males in a field cricket.
    Wagner WE; Smith AR; Basolo AL
    Biol Lett; 2007 Aug; 3(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 17567551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Male responses to conspecific advertisement signals in the field cricket Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).
    Jang Y
    PLoS One; 2011 Jan; 6(1):e16063. PubMed ID: 21283758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.