155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18090131)
1. The cytological screening turned out effective also for adenocarcinoma: a population-based case-control study in Trento, Italy.
Crocetti E; Battisti L; Betta A; Palma PD; Paci E; Piffer S; Pojer A; Polla E; Zappa M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 18090131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women.
Yang B; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Roder D; Tracey E; Jelfs P
Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Aug; 19(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 18286380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytological screening history of patients with early invasive cervical cancer.
Turner MJ; Keane DP; Flannelly GM; Lenehan PM; Murphy JF; Foley ME
Ir Med J; 1990 Jun; 83(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 2202697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Case-control study of the effectiveness of mass screening in reducing invasive cervical cancer].
Makino H; Sato S; Yajima A; Fukao A
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Sep; 43(9):1226-32. PubMed ID: 1919184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of invasive cervical cancer in relation to management of abnormal Pap smear results.
Silfverdal L; Kemetli L; Andrae B; Sparén P; Ryd W; Dillner J; Strander B; Törnberg S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):188.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19560117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment.
Gunnell AS; Ylitalo N; Sandin S; Sparén P; Adami HO; Ripatti S
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pap smear screening history of women with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Pak SC; Martens M; Bekkers R; Crandon AJ; Land R; Nicklin JL; Perrin LC; Obermair A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Dec; 47(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 17991118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing trends of cervical adenocarcinoma incidence in Central Italy despite Extensive Screening Programme, 1985-2000.
Visioli CB; Zappa M; Ciatto S; Iossa A; Crocetti E
Cancer Detect Prev; 2004; 28(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 15582270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assessment of cervical screening: a population-based case-control study in the C te-D'Or region, France.
Chaplain G; Quantin C; Brunet-Lecomte P; Mottot C; Michiels-Marzais D; Sasco AJ
Cancer Detect Prev; 2001; 25(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 11270420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
Spayne J; Ackerman I; Milosevic M; Seidenfeld A; Covens A; Paszat L
Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
