1069 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18090538)
1. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.
Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 15886439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
Amoore JN; Scott DH
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison between the oscillometric and the auscultatory method for ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring.
Wiinberg N; Raymond IE; Bang LE; Malmqvist BB; Svendsen TL; Petersen LJ
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Jun; 1(3):187-191. PubMed ID: 10226224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors.
Kawahara M
Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 2096748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
Amoore JN
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
Iyriboz Y
J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?
Mourad A; Carney S; Gillies A; Jones B; Nanra R; Trevillian P
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12764401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
