These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1809058)

  • 21. Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.
    Siadaty MS; Shu J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Dec; 4(1):27. PubMed ID: 15588327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening properties of questionnaires and laboratory tests for the detection of alcohol abuse or dependence in a general practice population.
    Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F; Ansoms S; Fevery J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Mar; 51(464):206-17. PubMed ID: 11255902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using multiple cutpoints for the free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio improves the accuracy of prostate cancer detection.
    Hoffman RM; Clanon DL; Chavez M; Peirce JC
    Prostate; 2002 Jul; 52(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 12111706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Tools for the evaluation of diagnostic techniques].
    Grenier B
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1991 Apr; 39(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 2062557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Basic principles on selection and use of diagnostic tests: properties of diagnostic tests.
    Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1267-74. PubMed ID: 11865687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interpretation of diagnostic data: 4. How to do it with a more complex table.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Oct; 129(8):832-5. PubMed ID: 6616389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Practical exercises on diagnostic test interpretation].
    Perez Sempere A; Diaz Guzman J
    Neurologia; 2003 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():46-52. PubMed ID: 14669107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When is a test positive? The use of decision analysis to optimize test interpretation.
    Bergus GR
    Fam Med; 1993; 25(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 8288070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.
    Maceneaney PM; Malone DE
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Mar; 55(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10708618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 2. Clinical applications.
    Weissler AM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1072-87. PubMed ID: 10560594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios.
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Mar; 31(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9506499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 'Likelihood-ratio' and 'odds' applied to monitoring of patients as a supplement to 'reference change value' (RCV).
    Petersen PH; Sandberg S; Iglesias N; Sölétormos G; Aarsand AK; Brandslund I; Jørgensen LG
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 18076354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value in laboratory tests].
    Takagi Y; Gomi K
    Nihon Rinsho; 1997 Mar; 55 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 9097554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The impact of disease prevalence on the predictive value of laboratory tests in primary care.
    Wiegert HT; Wiegert O
    J Fam Pract; 1979 Jun; 8(6):1199-203. PubMed ID: 448303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Mar; 96(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 17407452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Realistic expectations of laboratory testing.
    Fernandes JJ
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Dec; 91(12):1223-8. PubMed ID: 1800469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis.
    Fischer JE; Bachmann LM; Jaeschke R
    Intensive Care Med; 2003 Jul; 29(7):1043-51. PubMed ID: 12734652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What white blood cell count should prompt antibiotic treatment in a febrile child? Tutorial on the importance of disease likelihood to the interpretation of diagnostic tests.
    Kohn MA; Newman MP
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 11760105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.