BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18090762)

  • 1. Computer simulation of curvilinear mandibular distraction: accuracy and predictability.
    Scolozzi P; Link DW; Schendel SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7):1975-1980. PubMed ID: 18090762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities.
    Kaban LB; Seldin EB; Kikinis R; Yeshwant K; Padwa BL; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):996-1008. PubMed ID: 19375009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Curvilinear mandibular distraction results and long-term stability effects in a group of 40 patients.
    Aizenbud D; Hazan-Molina H; Thimmappa B; Hopkins EM; Schendel SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 20517103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distraction osteogenesis: its application in severe mandibular deformities in hemifacial microsomia.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    J Craniofac Surg; 1997 Sep; 8(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 9482086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular distraction combined with orthognathic techniques for the correction of severe adult mandibular hypoplasia.
    Yin L; Tang X; Shi L; Yin H; Zhang Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1947-52. PubMed ID: 25377953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with multidirectional extraoral distraction device in hemifacial microsomia patients: three-dimensional treatment planning, prediction tracings, and case outcomes.
    Tharanon W; Sinn DP
    J Craniofac Surg; 1999 May; 10(3):202-13. PubMed ID: 10530229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction.
    Dec W; Peltomaki T; Warren SM; Garfinkle JS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jun; 121(6):2084-2092. PubMed ID: 18520899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandibular hypoplasia with curvilinear distraction.
    Keçik D; Aydoğdu E; Ateş U; Uçkan S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 20072008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five year follow-up of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of syndromic children.
    Gürsoy S; Hukki J; Hurmerinta K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18199081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year follow-up of distraction osteogenesis: its effect on mandibular ramus height in hemifacial microsomia.
    Marquez IM; Fish LC; Stella JP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 10672212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
    Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia.
    Rachmiel A; Manor R; Peled M; Laufer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jul; 59(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 11429728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Condyle as the point of rotation for 3-D planning of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia.
    Paeng JY; Lee JH; Lee JH; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 35(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 17448668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Yeshwant K; Seldin EB; Gateno J; Everett P; White CL; Kikinis R; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 15742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgery-First Orthognathic Surgery for Severe Facial Asymmetry Combined With Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Using a Three-Dimensional Internal Distractor.
    Watanabe Y; Sasaki R; Matsuno I; Akizuki T
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30507886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional preoperative design of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia.
    Chen Y; Niu F; Yu B; Liu J; Wang M; Gui L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):184-8. PubMed ID: 24406575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A longitudinal three-dimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary report.
    Kusnoto B; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Nov; 10(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 10726500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis in children--a one-year follow-up study.
    Huang CS; Ko WC; Lin WY; Liou EJ; Hong KF; Chen YR
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 May; 36(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10342617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical guide assistant mandibular distraction osteogenesis and sagittal split osteotomy in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
    Shi L; Liu W; Yin L; Feng S; Xu S; Zhang ZY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):498-500. PubMed ID: 25699536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis by sagittal split osteotomy and intraoral curvilinear distraction.
    Schendel SA; Linck DW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jul; 15(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 15213543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.