These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18091101)

  • 1. Audiovisual perception of speech in noise and masked written text.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18091101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test.
    Zekveld AA; George EL; Kramer SE; Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 17538101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: the value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test.
    Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Houtgast T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 19778398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities.
    Besser J; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Festen JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):194-209. PubMed ID: 22199191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bimodal audio-visual training enhances auditory adaptation process.
    Kawase T; Sakamoto S; Hori Y; Maki A; Suzuki Y; Kobayashi T
    Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19629016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of audio-visual integration on the detection of masked speech and non-speech sounds.
    Eramudugolla R; Henderson R; Mattingley JB
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Feb; 75(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 21067852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental factors and the non-native speaker effect in auditory-visual speech perception.
    Chen Y; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):858-65. PubMed ID: 19640050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the use of the distortion-sensitivity approach in examining the role of linguistic abilities in speech understanding in noise.
    Goverts ST; Huysmans E; Kramer SE; de Groot AM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1702-8. PubMed ID: 22180022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.