These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18091167)

  • 1. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments.
    Sadig WM; Al Harbi MW
    Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 18091167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns.
    de Campos TN; Adachi LK; Miashiro K; Yoshida H; Shinkai RS; Neto PT; Frigerio ML
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 20664843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments.
    Rappelli G; Corso M; Coccia E; Camaioni E; Di Felice R; Procaccini M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 18427377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments.
    Ebert A; Hedderich J; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18271373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of die spacer on retention and fitting of complete cast crowns.
    Olivera AB; Saito T
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 16827737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of luting agents on the retention of dental implant-supported crowns.
    Pan YH; Lin CK
    Chang Gung Med J; 2005 Jun; 28(6):403-10. PubMed ID: 16124156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments.
    Keith SE; Miller BH; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 10379110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.