291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18091167)
1. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments.
Sadig WM; Al Harbi MW
Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 18091167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns.
de Campos TN; Adachi LK; Miashiro K; Yoshida H; Shinkai RS; Neto PT; Frigerio ML
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 20664843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments.
Rappelli G; Corso M; Coccia E; Camaioni E; Di Felice R; Procaccini M
Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 18427377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments.
Ebert A; Hedderich J; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18271373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of die spacer on retention and fitting of complete cast crowns.
Olivera AB; Saito T
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 16827737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of luting agents on the retention of dental implant-supported crowns.
Pan YH; Lin CK
Chang Gung Med J; 2005 Jun; 28(6):403-10. PubMed ID: 16124156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments.
Keith SE; Miller BH; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 10379110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
