These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18091167)

  • 21. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
    Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation.
    Wolfart M; Wolfart S; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 16955601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals.
    Fonseca RG; de Almeida JG; Haneda IG; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 19328279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
    Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of different surface treatments on cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
    Kurt M; Külünk T; Ural C; Külünk Ş; Danişman Ş; Savaş S
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Feb; 39(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 21142787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
    Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 17302949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
    Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retention of zirconia crowns to Ti-base abutments: effect of luting protocol, abutment treatment and autoclave sterilization.
    T P Bergamo E; Zahoui A; Luri Amorin Ikejiri L; Marun M; Peixoto da Silva K; G Coelho P; Soares S; A Bonfante E
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Jun; 65(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 32938879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations.
    Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Gross O; Priel I; Gross M; Chaushu G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21530042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of retention of cemented laser-sintered crowns on unmodified straight narrow implant abutments.
    Kilicarslan MA; Ozkan P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 23527338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper.
    Bresciano M; Schierano G; Manzella C; Screti A; Bignardi C; Preti G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 16164467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retentive strength of implant-supported base metal copings over short metal abutments using different luting agents and surface treatments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Ebrahimi M; Savabi G
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 24614878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.