These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18092365)

  • 1. Predicting first molar width using virtual models of dental arches.
    Lee SP; Delong R; Hodges JS; Hayashi K; Lee JB
    Clin Anat; 2008 Jan; 21(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18092365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy.
    Ronay V; Miner RM; Will LA; Arai K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 18774089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dental and basal arch forms using cone-beam CT and 3D virtual models of normal occlusion.
    Bayome M; Park JH; Han SH; Baek SH; Sameshima GT; Kook YA
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 23785937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth.
    Hesby RM; Marshall SD; Dawson DV; Southard KA; Casko JS; Franciscus RG; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17169734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays.
    Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Anderson PJ; Townsend GC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 22008304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
    Jedlińska A
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
    Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
    El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.
    Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tooth-position, arch-size, and arch-shape in the primary dentition.
    Tsai HH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(1):17-22, 10. PubMed ID: 11324401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
    Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular permanent first molar and incisor width as predictor of mandibular canine and premolar width.
    Melgaço CA; de Sousa Araújo MT; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17826602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
    Normando D; da Silva PL; Mendes ÁM
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment.
    Gianelly AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12532059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The application and correlation of Pont's Index to the facial framework of three main ethnic groups in Malaysia.
    Purmal K; Alam MK; Moganadass DD; Zakariat NN; Cheong NW
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 23785936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional computer-assisted study model analysis of long-term oral-appliance wear. Part 2. Side effects of oral appliances in obstructive sleep apnea patients.
    Chen H; Lowe AA; de Almeida FR; Fleetham JA; Wang B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):408-17. PubMed ID: 18774087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary and mandibular arch widths of Colombians.
    Alvaran N; Roldan SI; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 19409348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.