390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18094264)
21. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis?
Simpfendorfer C; Herts BR; Motta-Ramirez GA; Lockwood DS; Zhou M; Leiber M; Remer EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 19155407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images?
Hodgdon T; McInnes MD; Schieda N; Flood TA; Lamb L; Thornhill RE
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):787-96. PubMed ID: 25906183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT.
Leng S; Takahashi N; Gomez Cardona D; Kitajima K; McCollough B; Li Z; Kawashima A; Leibovich BC; McCollough CH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 28025654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma: the initial study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Lu Q; Wang W; Huang B; Li C; Li C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1896-901. PubMed ID: 22906749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma by texture analysis on CT images.
Yan L; Liu Z; Wang G; Huang Y; Liu Y; Yu Y; Liang C
Acad Radiol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1115-21. PubMed ID: 26031228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative Analysis of Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced CT Images: A Pilot Study of Preoperative Prediction of Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Tang Z; Yu D; Ni T; Zhao T; Jin Y; Dong E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):370-382. PubMed ID: 31799870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Leng S; Kitajima K; Gomez-Cardona D; Thapa P; Carter RE; Leibovich BC; Sasiwimonphan K; Sasaguri K; Kawashima A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1194-202. PubMed ID: 26587925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Utility of material-specific fat images derived from rapid-kVp-switch dual-energy renal mass CT for diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma.
Walker D; Udare A; Chatelain R; McInnes M; Flood T; Schieda N
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1263-1272. PubMed ID: 32957794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.
Li CX; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Yan LX; Zheng FY; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 26971426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging.
Sasiwimonphan K; Takahashi N; Leibovich BC; Carter RE; Atwell TD; Kawashima A
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22344404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CT radiomics for differentiating fat poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dehghani Firouzabadi F; Gopal N; Hasani A; Homayounieh F; Li X; Jones EC; Yazdian Anari P; Turkbey E; Malayeri AA
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0287299. PubMed ID: 37498830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma: US differentiation.
Siegel CL; Middleton WD; Teefey SA; McClennan BL
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):789-93. PubMed ID: 8628873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiomics of small renal masses on multiphasic CT: accuracy of machine learning-based classification models for the differentiation of renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma without visible fat.
Yang R; Wu J; Sun L; Lai S; Xu Y; Liu X; Ma Y; Zhen X
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 31468159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictive Value of Chemical-Shift MRI in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma.
Jhaveri KS; Elmi A; Hosseini-Nik H; Hedgire S; Evans A; Jewett M; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W79-86. PubMed ID: 26102422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utility of CT Texture Analysis in Differentiating Low-Attenuation Renal Cell Carcinoma From Cysts: A Bi-Institutional Retrospective Study.
Kim NY; Lubner MG; Nystrom JT; Swietlik JF; Abel EJ; Havighurst TC; Silverman SG; McGahan JP; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 31386573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT?
Jonisch AI; Rubinowitz AN; Mutalik PG; Israel GM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 17456870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Subtype Differentiation of Small (≤ 4 cm) Solid Renal Mass Using Volumetric Histogram Analysis of DWI at 3-T MRI.
Li A; Xing W; Li H; Hu Y; Hu D; Li Z; Kamel IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):614-623. PubMed ID: 29812980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
