293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18094636)
1. Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods.
Sawyer LJ; Starritt HC; Hiscock SC; Evans MJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 18094636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT dosimetry: getting the best from the adult Cristy phantom.
Castellano IA; Dance DR; Evans PM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):321-5. PubMed ID: 15933130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols.
Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comprehensive method for calculating patient effective dose and other dosimetric quantities from CT DICOM images.
Tsalafoutas IA; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 22733904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution.
Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Miller CM; Nelson RC; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1141-7. PubMed ID: 19770340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of absorbed doses from paediatric cone-beam CT scans: MOSFET measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Frush DP; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19889800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. X-ray beam filtration, dosimetry phantom size and CT patient dose conversion factors.
Huda W; Sterzik A; Tipnis S
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):551-61. PubMed ID: 20023330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Organ and effective dose evaluation in diagnostic radiology based on in-phantom dose measurements with novel photodiode-dosemeters.
Kawaura C; Aoyama T; Koyama S; Achiwa M; Mori M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(4):421-30. PubMed ID: 16439515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concepts for dose determination in flat-detector CT.
Kyriakou Y; Deak P; Langner O; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3551-66. PubMed ID: 18552416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the peak entrance surface air kerma for patients undergoing computed tomography-guided procedures.
Avilés Lucas P; Dance DR; Castellano IA; Vañó E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):317-20. PubMed ID: 15933129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 6: conversion factors for reconstruction of organ dose in abdominal radiography].
Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):945-61. PubMed ID: 19517339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of photon dose calculation algorithms on expected dose distributions in lungs under different respiratory phases.
Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Winkler P; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2375-90. PubMed ID: 18421117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
