140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18094981)
1. A cyclic testing comparison of FasT-Fix and RapidLoc devices in human cadaveric meniscus.
Nyland J; Chang H; Kocabey Y; Nawab A; Brand J; Caborn DN
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 May; 128(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 18094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus.
Kocabey Y; Chang HC; Brand JC; Nawab A; Nyland J; Caborn DN
Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16581453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical testing of suture-based meniscal repair devices containing ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture: update 2011.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Bava ED; Drew OR
Arthroscopy; 2012 Jun; 28(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 22317797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical testing of new meniscal repair techniques containing ultra high-molecular weight polyethylene suture.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Schroeder FA; Aziz-Jacobo J; Sutker MJ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Sep; 25(9):959-67. PubMed ID: 19732633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures.
Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R
Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of lesion location on fixation strength of the meniscal viper repair system: an in vitro study using porcine menisci.
Chang HC; Caborn DN; Nyland J; Burden R
Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 16581451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study].
Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Georg T; Kohn D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 12610434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclic testing of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors: biomechanical analysis.
Zantop T; Eggers AK; Musahl V; Weimann A; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2005 Mar; 33(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 15716254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.
Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP
Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elongation and structural properties of meniscal repair using suture techniques in distraction and shear force scenarios: biomechanical evaluation using a cyclic loading protocol.
Zantop T; Temmig K; Weimann A; Eggers AK; Raschke MJ; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2006 May; 34(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 16567460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices.
Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN
Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1074-81. PubMed ID: 23475943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical evaluation of all-inside 2-stitch meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair.
Ramappa AJ; Chen A; Hertz B; Wexler M; Grimaldi Bournissaint L; DeAngelis JP; Nazarian A
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 24114752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.
Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17418326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Horizontal suture placement influences meniscal repair fixation strength.
Kocabey Y; Taser O; Nyland J; Ince H; Sahin F; Sunbuloglu E; Baysal G
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Mar; 21(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 22484371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cyclic testing of 3 all-inside meniscal repair devices: a biomechanical analysis.
Mehta VM; Terry MA
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Dec; 37(12):2435-9. PubMed ID: 19797615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system with vertical mattress sutures and meniscus arrows.
Borden P; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Pienkowski D
Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(3):374-8. PubMed ID: 12750129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. All-inside meniscal repair devices compared with their matched inside-out vertical mattress suture repair: introducing 10,000 and 100,000 loading cycles.
Rosso C; Müller S; Buckland DM; Schwenk T; Zimmermann S; de Wild M; Valderrabano V
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 42(9):2226-33. PubMed ID: 24966304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Biomechanical Performance of the Latest All-Inside Meniscal Repair Devices.
Barber FA; Howard MS; Ashraf W; Spenciner DB
Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3001-3007. PubMed ID: 32315765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques.
Aşík M; Sener N
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11819017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial fixation strength of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors in comparison to conventional suture technique and rigid anchors: biomechanical evaluation of new meniscus refixation systems.
Zantop T; Eggers AK; Weimann A; Hassenpflug J; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2004 Jun; 32(4):863-9. PubMed ID: 15150031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
