These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18095517)

  • 1. Does valve design impact the maximum implantable bioprosthetic diameter? A prospective, multicenter observational study.
    David IB; Catinella F; Herskowitz K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Nov; 16(6):662-6; discussion 666. PubMed ID: 18095517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis.
    Seitelberger R; Bialy J; Gottardi R; Seebacher G; Moidl R; Mittelböck M; Simon P; Wolner E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Wagner IM; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic annulus diameter and valve design each determine the valve size implanted.
    von Oppell UO; Segadal L; Busund R; Johnston GG; Dimitrakakis G; Masani N; Lung TH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Sep; 21(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 23167223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Avoidance of patient-prosthesis mismatch].
    Sakamoto Y; Hashimoto K
    Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 16613142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy of sizers for conventional and stentless aortic valve implants.
    Walther T; Falk V; Weigl C; Diegeler A; Rauch T; Autschbach R; Mohr FW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 9130122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 53(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16037868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of eight prosthetic aortic valves in a cadaver model.
    Youdelman BA; Hirose H; Jain H; Kresh JY; Entwistle JW; Wechsler AS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 134(6):1526-32. PubMed ID: 18023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement.
    Nozohoor S; Nilsson J; Lührs C; Roijer A; Sjögren J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1310-7. PubMed ID: 18355517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis.
    García-Bengochea J; Sierra J; González-Juanatey JR; Rubio J; Vega M; Fernández AL; Sánchez D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival.
    Moon MR; Pasque MK; Munfakh NA; Melby SJ; Lawton JS; Moazami N; Codd JE; Crabtree TD; Barner HB; Damiano RJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 81(2):481-8; discussion 489. PubMed ID: 16427836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Durability and prevalence of aortic regurgitation nine years after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV stentless bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Goldman B; Verrier E; Petracek M; Wood J; Goldman S; David TE;
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jan; 13(1):64-72; discussion 72. PubMed ID: 14765842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison.
    Borger MA; Nette AF; Maganti M; Feindel CM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):2054-8. PubMed ID: 17532395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximizing prosthetic valve size with the Top Hat supra-annular aortic valve.
    Aagaard J; Geha AS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 17315387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic valve replacement: is there an implant size variation across Europe?
    Kapetanakis EI; Athanasiou T; Mestres CA; Nashef SA; Aagaard J; Moritz A; Van Ingen G; Chronidou F; Palatianos G; Alivizatos PA; Stavridis GT
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 18512492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.