These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18096149)

  • 1. Phonotactic probability influences speech production.
    Goldrick M; Larson M
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1155-64. PubMed ID: 18096149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.
    Vitevitch MS; Armbruster J; Chu S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):514-29. PubMed ID: 14979821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment.
    Munson B; Kurtz BA; Windsor J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1033-47. PubMed ID: 16411794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reliability of independent measures of phonology in the assessment of toddlers' speech.
    Morris SR
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2009 Jan; 40(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 18840673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Schwa elision in fast speech: segmental deletion or gestural overlap?
    Davidson L
    Phonetica; 2006; 63(2-3):79-112. PubMed ID: 17028458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production.
    Mitterer H; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):244-63. PubMed ID: 19170486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics.
    Redford MA
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):785-816. PubMed ID: 18237726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: speech production and word position.
    Zamuner TS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 18723600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonotactic patterns in the speech of children with Down syndrome.
    Rupela V; Manjula R
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Aug; 21(8):605-22. PubMed ID: 17653970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonotactic probabilities in young children's speech production.
    Zamuner TS; Gerken L; Hammond M
    J Child Lang; 2004 Aug; 31(3):515-36. PubMed ID: 15612388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 16569154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clear speech production of Korean stops: changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies.
    Kang KH; Guion SG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3909-17. PubMed ID: 19206816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1194-212. PubMed ID: 15603471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.
    Lee MW; Gibbons J
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):446-56. PubMed ID: 17097626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finding levels of abstraction in speech production: evidence from sound-production impairment.
    Buchwald A; Miozzo M
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 21828349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A parallel licensing model of normal slips and phonemic paraphasias.
    Wheeler DW; Touretzky DS
    Brain Lang; 1997 Aug; 59(1):147-201. PubMed ID: 9262854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: implications for a new model of speech production.
    Romani C; Galluzzi C; Bureca I; Olson A
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Mar; 62(2):151-92. PubMed ID: 21109241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of English reading passages for elicitation of speech samples from clinical populations.
    Powell TW
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):91-7. PubMed ID: 16428224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcribing disordered speech: by target or by production?
    Ball MJ
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(10-11):864-70. PubMed ID: 18608236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.