These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Use and utility of the Bravo pH capsule. Pandolfino JE; Kwiatek MA J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 42(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 18364590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)]. Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial. Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 48-hour wireless oesophageal pH-monitoring in children: are two days better than one? Gunnarsdóttir A; Stenström P; Arnbjörnsson E Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Dec; 17(6):378-81. PubMed ID: 18072019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico. Remes-Troche JM; Ibarra-Palomino J; Carmona-Sánchez RI; Valdovinos MA Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2382-6. PubMed ID: 16279888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure. Marchese M; Spada C; Iacopini F; Familiari P; Shah SG; Tringali A; Costamagna G Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations? Maerten P; Ortner M; Michetti P; Dorta G Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):235-40. PubMed ID: 18174686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and tolerability of the Bravo catheter-free pH capsule in patients between the ages of 4 and 18 years. Croffie JM; Fitzgerald JF; Molleston JP; Gupta SK; Corkins MR; Pfefferkorn MD; Lim JR; Steiner SJ; Dadzie SK J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2007 Nov; 45(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 18030233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review article: modern technology in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--Bilitec, intraluminal impedance and Bravo capsule pH monitoring. Hirano I Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Mar; 23 Suppl 1():12-24. PubMed ID: 16483266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. Håkanson BS; Berggren P; Granqvist S; Ljungqvist O; Thorell A Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009; 44(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 19040176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reflux monitoring: pH-metry, Bilitec and oesophageal impedance measurements. Pohl D; Tutuian R Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2009; 23(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 19505660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tolerability and clinical utility of the Bravo pH capsule in children. Lacy BE; Edwards S; Paquette L; Weiss J; Kelley ML; Ornvold K J Clin Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 43(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 19349903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring by using a wireless system: a pilot study in Taiwan. Tu CH; Lee YC; Wang HP; Wu MS; Chiu HM; Lin JT Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1586-9. PubMed ID: 15532783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]