These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18097272)

  • 21. T2-weighted cardiac MR assessment of the myocardial area-at-risk and salvage area in acute reperfused myocardial infarction: comparison of state-of-the-art dark blood and bright blood T2-weighted sequences.
    Viallon M; Mewton N; Thuny F; Guehring J; O'Donnell T; Stemmer A; Bi X; Rapacchi S; Zuehlsdorff S; Revel D; Croisille P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 35(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21959873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantifying the area-at-risk of myocardial infarction in-vivo using arterial spin labeling cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Dongworth RK; Campbell-Washburn AE; Cabrera-Fuentes HA; Bulluck H; Roberts T; Price AN; Hernández-Reséndiz S; Ordidge RJ; Thomas DL; Yellon DM; Lythgoe MF; Hausenloy DJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2271. PubMed ID: 28536472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Myocardial infarction quantification with late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in rats using a 7-T scanner.
    Luo D; Yao YY; Li YF; Sheng ZL; Tang Y; Fang F; Fang K; Ma GS; Teng GJ
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2012; 21(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 21652224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Percent infarct mapping: an R1-map-based CE-MRI method for determining myocardial viability distribution.
    Surányi P; Kiss P; Brott BC; Simor T; Elgavish A; Ruzsics B; Saab-Ismail NH; Elgavish GA
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Sep; 56(3):535-45. PubMed ID: 16892184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Delayed enhancement and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronic myocardial infarction.
    Abdel-Aty H; Zagrosek A; Schulz-Menger J; Taylor AJ; Messroghli D; Kumar A; Gross M; Dietz R; Friedrich MG
    Circulation; 2004 May; 109(20):2411-6. PubMed ID: 15123531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bifunctional staining for ex vivo determination of area at risk in rabbits with reperfused myocardial infarction.
    Feng Y; Ma ZL; Chen F; Yu J; Cona MM; Xie Y; Li Y; Ni Y
    World J Methodol; 2013 Sep; 3(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 25237621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of an edema-sensitive HASTE-TIRM sequence with delayed contrast enhancement in acute myocardial infarcts].
    Stork A; Lund GK; Bansmann M; Kemper J; Weiss F; Steiner P; Meinertz T; Adam G
    Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 12584618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Myocardium at risk can be determined by ex vivo T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging even in the presence of gadolinium: comparison to myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography.
    Ubachs JF; Engblom H; Koul S; Kanski M; Andersson P; van der Pals J; Carlsson M; Erlinge D; Arheden H
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 14(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 22822155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of semi-automated methods to quantify infarct size and area at risk by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths.
    Khan JN; Nazir SA; Horsfield MA; Singh A; Kanagala P; Greenwood JP; Gershlick AH; McCann GP
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Feb; 8():52. PubMed ID: 25889795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. T2-based area-at-risk and edema are influenced by ischemic duration in acute myocardial infarction.
    Thomas R; Thai K; Barry J; Wright GA; Strauss BH; Ghugre NR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jun; 79():1-4. PubMed ID: 33652063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of Area at Risk Quantification by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance According to the Myocardial Infarction Territory.
    Fernández-Friera L; García-Ruiz JM; García-Álvarez A; Fernández-Jiménez R; Sánchez-González J; Rossello X; Gómez-Talavera S; López-Martín GJ; Pizarro G; Fuster V; Ibáñez B
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2017 May; 70(5):323-330. PubMed ID: 27592277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distinction of salvaged and infarcted myocardium within the ischaemic area-at-risk with T2 mapping.
    Hammer-Hansen S; Ugander M; Hsu LY; Taylor J; Thune JJ; Køber L; Kellman P; Arai AE
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Sep; 15(9):1048-53. PubMed ID: 24810903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MRI of reperfused myocardial infarct in dogs.
    Tscholakoff D; Higgins CB; Sechtem U; Caputo G; Derugin N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 May; 146(5):925-30. PubMed ID: 3485909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of myocardial infarction and postinfarction scar remodeling with an elastin-specific magnetic resonance agent.
    Wildgruber M; Bielicki I; Aichler M; Kosanke K; Feuchtinger A; Settles M; Onthank DC; Cesati RR; Robinson SP; Huber AM; Rummeny EJ; Walch AK; Botnar RM
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 7(2):321-9. PubMed ID: 24363356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of homogenous strain-analysis with wall thickening for the MR tomographic assessment of regional myocardial function].
    Thomas D; Pickup S; Zhou R; Glickson J; Ferrari VA
    Rofo; 2005 Jul; 177(7):975-85. PubMed ID: 15973600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T using 0.15mmol/kg of contrast agent for the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction.
    Yang J; Ma H; Liu J; Wang C; Shi Y; Xie H; Huo F; Liu F; Lin K
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):778-82. PubMed ID: 24565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Magnetic resonance tomography imaging techniques for diagnosing myocardial vitality].
    Baer FM; Theissen P; Schneider CA; Voth E; Schicha H; Sechtem U
    Herz; 1994 Feb; 19(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 8150414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of phase-sensitive versus magnitude reconstructed inversion recovery imaging for the assessment of myocardial infarction in mice with a clinical magnetic resonance scanner.
    Wildgruber M; Settles M; Kosanke K; Bielicki I; Ntziachristos V; Rummeny EJ; Botnar RM; Huber AM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1372-82. PubMed ID: 22972713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cardiac MRI of myocardial salvage at the peri-infarct border zones after primary coronary intervention.
    O'Regan DP; Ahmed R; Neuwirth C; Tan Y; Durighel G; Hajnal JV; Nadra I; Corbett SJ; Cook SA
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2009 Jul; 297(1):H340-6. PubMed ID: 19429834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging can distinguish remodeling mechanisms after acute myocardial infarction based on the severity of ischemic insult.
    Ghugre NR; Pop M; Barry J; Connelly KA; Wright GA
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Oct; 70(4):1095-105. PubMed ID: 23165643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.