72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1811031)
1. Dentofacial appearance: a comparison of patient self-assessment techniques.
Maxwell R; Kiyak HA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 1811031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correcting vertically altered faces: orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
Arnett GW; Kreashko RG; Jelic JS
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(4):267-76. PubMed ID: 10196814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Facial anthropometrics versus cephalometry as predictors for surgical treatment in patients with Class III dentofacial deformities.
Magalhaes AE; Stella JP; Epker BN
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 9082019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients.
Bos A; Hoogstraten J; Prahl-Andersen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 12594417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery.
Bell R; Kiyak HA; Joondeph DR; McNeill RW; Wallen TR
Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 3863490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptions of preoperative expectations and postoperative outcomes from orthognathic surgery: part I: Turkish female patients.
Türker N; Varol A; Ogel K; Basa S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(8):710-5. PubMed ID: 18539437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 3-Dimensional Facial Morpho-Dynamic Database in the development of a prediction model in orthognathic surgery.
Peretta R; Concheri G; Comelli D; Meneghello R; Galzignato PF; Ferronato G
Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):8-19. PubMed ID: 19350055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychological impact of self-image dissatisfaction after orthognathic surgery: a case report.
Pavone I; Rispoli A; Acocella A; Scott AA; Nardi P
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 15952550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular setback with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
Ingervall B; Thüer U; Vuillemin T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 9081988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.
Vargo JK; Gladwin M; Ngan P
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12627797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-assessment of profile and body image among orthognathic surgery patients before and two years after surgery.
Kiyak HA; Zeitler DL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 May; 46(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 3163369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
Thüer U; Ingervall B; Vuillemin T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of video imaging on patients' perceptions and expectations.
Phillips C; Hill BJ; Cannac C
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 7486240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
