These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1812507)
1. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. Osborne JW; Norman RD; Gale EN Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):857-64. PubMed ID: 1812507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy. Osborne JW; Berry TG Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of high-copper dental amalgams with and without admixed indium. Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 1524741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations. Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC; Millar M Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results. Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes. Lutz F; Krejci I Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8008818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects. Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longevity of low- and high-copper amalgams analyzed by preparation class, tooth site, patient age, and operator. Smales RJ Oper Dent; 1991; 16(5):162-8. PubMed ID: 1813870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical properties and clinical performance of a gallium restorative material. Osborne JW; Summitt JB Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):241-5. PubMed ID: 8710706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A basic study on gallium alloys for dental restorations. Improvement of liquid gallium alloy]. Yada I Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1989; 16(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 2488904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access. Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents. van Dijken JW Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 1817352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]