These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1812507)

  • 21. 13-year clinical assessment of 10 amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW; Norman RD
    Dent Mater; 1990 Jul; 6(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 2086293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of three amalgam alloys.
    Tyas MJ; Ewers GJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 8373297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical performance and physical properties of twelve amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW; Gale EN; Chew CL; Rhodes BF; Phillips RW
    J Dent Res; 1978; 57(11-12):983-8. PubMed ID: 281345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams.
    Mair LH
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Edge-bevel fracture resistance of three direct-filling materials.
    Hoard RJ; Eichmiller FC; Parry EE; Giuseppetti AA
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 11203814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of inductively coupled plasma-emission spectroscopy and mercury vapor analyses to evaluate elemental release from a high-copper dental amalgam: a pilot study.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):409-12. PubMed ID: 11319540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of a refrigerated amalgam bonding system on fracture resistance.
    Hagge MS; Lindemuth JS
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(1):52-5; quiz 56-7. PubMed ID: 12029797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental silver amalgams with added copper: a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Leinfelder KF; Sluder TB; Sockwell CL; Taylor DF
    Oper Dent; 1978; 3(2):42-50. PubMed ID: 288030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The tensile creep characteristics of dental amalgam. I. Stress dependence.
    Cruickshanks-Boyd DW; Roswati N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Sep; 15(5):769-80. PubMed ID: 12659141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of amalgam alloys: an update.
    Mahler DB; Bryant RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 127(9):1351-6. PubMed ID: 8854611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Survival predictions of amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA; Leppard PI
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 1806592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tensile bond strength of repaired amalgam.
    Hadavi F; Hey JH; Czech D; Ambrose ER
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1507091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.