These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1812905)

  • 1. Clinical evaluations on thermal versus mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Kraut J; Radin S; Trowbridge HI; Emling RC; Yankell SL
    J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):92-6. PubMed ID: 1812905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluations on thermal debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Sernetz F; Kraut J
    J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):87-91. PubMed ID: 1812904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets.
    Kitahara-Céia FM; Mucha JN; Marques dos Santos PA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):548-55. PubMed ID: 18929273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical and electrothermal debonding: effect on ceramic veneers and dental pulp.
    Lee-Knight CT; Wylie SG; Major PW; Glover KE; Grace M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9294354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
    Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review.
    Azzeh E; Feldon PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 12532067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
    Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Crooks M; Hood J; Harkness M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 9057616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' report of discomfort and pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of two methods.
    Normando TS; Calçada FS; Ursi WJ; Normando D
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e29-34. PubMed ID: 21490985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets. An in vitro study.
    Brouns EM; Schopf PM; Kocjancic B
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 8500537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental traumatic debonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Yapel MJ; Quick DC
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 8010521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of bracket removal on enamel.
    Heravi F; Rashed R; Raziee L
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19113075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Jost-Brinkmann PG; Stein H; Miethke RR; Nakata M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 1476106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Non-contact measurement of the increase in pulp temperature during thermal debonding].
    Baumann M; Ruppenthal T
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():1025-32. PubMed ID: 1842242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser.
    Ma T; Marangoni RD; Flint W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 9057621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.